I think I am the exception to that if only by a little bit. Oh and fix'd.people don't understand... i dont see how they don't
edit: people who werent here when dire got banned do not understand
I think I am the exception to that if only by a little bit. Oh and fix'd.people don't understand... i dont see how they don't
edit: people who werent here when dire got banned do not understand
What I'm saying is that he claims he never spread true pictures of her. Is it impossible that he had a random nude spray or whatever that he found in a 7chan dump and she claimed it was her? There is literally no way to prove that the stuff it was claimed he was going to spread was even the stuff that she sent him. 1. because there is no person at the computer that looks like those pictures as a reference and 2. because she had lied previously about personal things. and when i say personal i mean interpersonal, not my name is anya.We already know the pictures she gave dire were fake. Now we know that. like when she made that topic we knew that.
But at the time direwulf was posting the /threatening no one knew they were fake buy anya
What I'm saying is that he claims he never spread true pictures of her. Is it impossible that he had a random nude spray or whatever that he found in a 7chan dump and she claimed it was her? There is literally no way to prove that the stuff it was claimed he was going to spread was even the stuff that she sent him. 1. because there is no person at the computer that looks like those pictures as a reference and 2. because she had lied previously about personal things. and when i say personal i mean interpersonal, not my name is anya.
also define 'here' i was eating popcorn the whole time the second ban drama was going down...
I have not FUCKING SHARED ANY NUDE PICTURES OF FUCKING ANYA....only one other person has those pictures besides me and her name is Anya....I don't know who is sharing the pictures.
no i'm saying that it could have been pictures outside of her dump dude. she could have 'claimed' any of the pictures of her target id's bodyshape as being of her.this is where you are wrong gilldy.
no i'm saying that it could have been pictures outside of her dump dude.
so if i said I had naked pictures of a male friend and made a spray of a random penis and spread that around i would get banned? even if the dude i knew was black and the spray i made was of a clearly white man? (keep in mind that the friend never claims to be black, but it's revealed later on to be the situation. Also his testimony is how i get banned.)they could be. be the intent of spreading it is still there. he still threatened to post anya naked. Thats where the evidence is agaisnt him. and some of his friends did get those pictures
Slander? I don't really want to start up anything with you or anyone else. I don't have the time and it's not worth my energy tbh.Can we even get anya to confirm that those were the fake nudes that she was spreading around as her own? I've had all kinds of threats on my person about the horrible things that people would do to me and I know for a fact that Anya on her own doesn't think that sort of shit is against the rules as written. She didn't speak up for me when lordthree was saying rather unfortunate things to me and about me in the middle of the night in turbine.
Hell, if I couldn't get steak banned for spreading actual real traceable shit about me, then dire has no business being banned.
also, i am almost never in dustbowl but i've lurked these forums for awhile longer than i've had a forum account. I have a memory for drama. I hated direwulf when this shit was going down, but anya/rhi has proved to be a liar in the face of being outed. she's also been shown to slander people that she's been creeping on if they get too much info about her. I do not trust this. I think he should be unbanned.
so if i said I had naked pictures of a male friend and made a spray of a random penis and spread that around i would get banned? even if the dude i knew was black and the spray i made was of a clearly white man? (keep in mind that the friend never claims to be black, but it's revealed later on to be the situation. Also his testimony is how i get banned.)
so if i said I had naked pictures of a male friend and made a spray of a random penis and spread that around i would get banned? even if the dude i knew was black and the spray i made was of a clearly white man? (keep in mind that the friend never claims to be black, but it's revealed later on to be the situation. Also his testimony is how i get banned.)
probably, but it's not even the point of it. There are tons of people we could do without and yet you're told to just client mute. or block or whatever.I think most of us if not all can agree that his bans are at least for the most part justified and that we'd all be better off without him in the long run.
1. There was a spray if i remember correctly. I WISH I HAD PHOTOGRAPHIC MEMORY SO I COULD JUST SEARCH OUT THE THREAD.I was never 100% sure on the photos and I never claimed to be. The images he "sent" out never surfaced to any admin as far as I am aware and yes, anything I sent to him was not me. In turn, there was no "lie to get direwulf banned", he made MANY posts on the forums threatening me and starting shit and pretty much stating "HEY IF YOU WANT HER PINFO, MESSAGE ME."
And at the time of everything with Lord3 we didn't really have any solid rule against harassment/whatever bullshit he was saying and I didn't feel comfortable putting a ban in place and opening up that can of worms without a definite, clear rule backing me up.
No, I think he's crossed the line way too many times to be considered just one of those "people we could do without".probably, but it's not even the point of it. There are tons of people we could do without and yet you're told to just client mute. or block or whatever.
This is the reason I voted no. I was not around so I only have this to go off of.Can we just put it like this guys? Doesn't matter why he was banned, just that he was, he came back avoiding another permaban using a new account which is grounds for an additional permaban. End of story. No need to drag up old drama when this is all there is to it now. At least for us new people.
probably, but it's not even the point of it. There are tons of people we could do without and yet you're told to just client mute. or block or whatever.
1. There was a spray if i remember correctly. I WISH I HAD PHOTOGRAPHIC MEMORY SO I COULD JUST SEARCH OUT THE THREAD.
2. He made life uncomfortable for you and threatened you. He never actually broke that rule, unless you had a random stranger calling you on behalf of him? We never got steak banned for basically stalking out my facebook and then sharing my facebook that at the time had my address and number on it. Why do you get special treatment again?
3. You have dealt with bullshit drunk/high people in the past. You wouldn't even tell him to calm down. I have lost faith in you as an 'authority' figure from that point on.
ex: I can say I know the home address of someone i know. i might have their cell number because i dunno, i need to reach them for stuff... say it's a cali area code but i know they live in like... florida. I could claim i have pictures of them. they could be honestly concerned that i do. I do not. I claim it again and again and threaten to send out info to pms, do i get banned for spreading personal info? what if i never gave out a number?
This thread is still going?...