Official Unban Direwulf

[Roman]

I would like to withdraw my 'no' vote.
I have no valuable opinion on this matter.

Neither do 90% of the people in this thread.

I'm tempted to unban him and treat him like a new user since he's been fairly low-profile recently. His name didn't cross people's tongues until he got re-banned.

I took those into account when I re-calculated. So with Kitty we're still even.

 

[Antamania]

I took those into account when I re-calculated. So with Kitty we're still even.

He also forgot to include Styx's.

 

[Roman]

So if the vote is stupid, and if no one knows him, why is this an issue?

 

[KillerZebra]

so with styx and ktity is





53 yes 58 no


i don't see how that is even. Bottiger said leave it up to the poll, Right now the poll says no.

 

[Roman]

Still not a fair assessment, as not everyone who voted has voiced an opinion nor been back to read other arguments.

People can't change votes in this poll, unfortunately. Plus the initial posting was kind of biased. I don't think this is fair to the accused. This poll should have been made in the Regular section.

 

[KillerZebra]

Still not a fair assessment, as not everyone who voted has voiced an opinion nor been back to read other arguments.

People can't change votes in this poll, unfortunately. Plus the initial posting was kind of biased. I don't think this is fair to the accused. This poll should have been made in the Regular section.

you are willing to do/say anything to get him unbanned arnt you

 

[Roman]

No, I'm pointing out the fallacies in others' logic.

 

[KillerZebra]

No, I'm pointing out the fallacies in others' logic.

i think we wouldn't even be having this conversation if the poll was going the other way. you wouldnt be questioning the poll at all

 

[SadWhale]

Still not a fair assessment, as not everyone who voted has voiced an opinion nor been back to read other arguments.

People can't change votes in this poll, unfortunately. Plus the initial posting was kind of biased. I don't think this is fair to the accused. This poll should have been made in the Regular section.

The voting system in the US has a popular vote and electoral college vote.
Perhaps there should also be a seperate vote amongst admins given the age of the circumstances surrounding this case.

 

[Roman]

I think the ratings speak volumes here. You literally pointed out how Direwulf was causing drama in the OP, then later said "oh i never said that was him."

 

[KillerZebra]

I think the ratings speak volumes here. You literally pointed out how Direwulf was causing drama in the OP, then later said "oh i never said that was him."

what? i never said he wasn't causing drama. he was. I just didn't explain it enough. The moment i banned him he was telling other used via pm that i banned him because rhi and i are dating. He is already back to that. Except its not true. he is STARTING DRAMA.

you are right though. i never claimed that chat logs to be dires. For people who actually looked at it its obviously not his.

 

[Roman]

what? i never said he wasn't causing drama. he was. I just didn't explain it enough. The moment i banned him he was telling other used via pm that i banned him because rhi and i are dating. He is already back to that. Except its not true. he is STARTING DRAMA

I'm not getting worked up. I don't think anyone is except for a few admins, actually.

Who here feels dramatic?

 

[Dave the Manly]

Still not a fair assessment, as not everyone who voted has voiced an opinion nor been back to read other arguments.

People can't change votes in this poll, unfortunately. Plus the initial posting was kind of biased. I don't think this is fair to the accused. This poll should have been made in the mmph section.

The what section?

 

[SgtGiraffe]

what? i never said he wasn't causing drama. he was. I just didn't explain it enough. The moment i banned him he was telling other used via pm that i banned him because rhi and i are dating. He is already back to that. Except its not true. he is STARTING DRAMA

so u banned him for a pm he sent to some one else

 

[KillerZebra]

I think the ratings speak volumes here. You literally pointed out how Direwulf was causing drama in the OP, then later said "oh i never said that was him."

and obviously you didnt read the post. I added the chat log in about 20 mins after the poll.

Here is some proof that dire is still dire causing drama. he was talking to some guy via pm and than having him talk to me through the server. heres a log

2012-07-31 14:59:55 is telling me a story.









skial.com | DUSTBOWL+ | Chicago cp_dustbowl
2012-07-31 14:59:51 the guy u banned.









skial.com | DUSTBOWL+ | Chicago cp_dustbowl
2012-07-31 14:59:41 iono.









skial.com | DUSTBOWL+ | Chicago cp_dustbowl
2012-07-31 14:59:25 XD.









skial.com | DUSTBOWL+ | Chicago cp_dustbowl
2012-07-31 14:59:15 woah killlerzebra u have admin gf?.









skial.com | DUSTBOWL+ | Chicago cp_dustbowl

http://www.skial.com/stats/hlstats.php?mode=chathistory&player=1325212

 

[Dave the Manly]

so u banned him for a pm he sent to some one else

For starting drama, no less.

 

[Roman]

Still biased.

No, I'm pointing out the fallacies in others' logic.

 

[KillerZebra]

Still biased.

What did i do that was biased? explain to me. I simply posted a fact that he hasn't changed. and so did rhi.

 

[Roman]

You started a poll basically with "HEY SHOULD WE UNBAN THIS GUY WHO IS A GUY ON THE INTERNET MAKING FUN OF ME?"

 

[The Dude]

what? i never said he wasn't causing drama. he was. I just didn't explain it enough. The moment i banned him he was telling other used via pm that i banned him because rhi and i are dating. He is already back to that. Except its not true. he is STARTING DRAMA.

you are right though. i never claimed that chat logs to be dires. For people who actually looked at it its obviously not his.

You started the Drama again, he was minding his own business until you banned him.