New Suggestion thread. Ban everyone who doesn't capitalize the N in Cinic. Ooops. :troll:
Nonono, I just don't get the people who capitalize both of the C's, but not the N. Like in Scrambles' Herald video, I was "CiniC".
 
Nonono, I just don't get the people who capitalize both of the C's, but not the N. Like in Scrambles' Herald video, I was "CiniC".

Ever see that post about the "Cambridge Study" that featured a paragraph of scrambled words stating that as long as the first and last letters of the word are in the same position, most people will not have trouble reading any of the words? Probably has something to do with that, like people not noticing it's capitalized.
 
+1 having peoples opinions is not part of the reports/bans system, so why be able to give it with one click?
 
Oh shie, ol Maddo is pissed, run before he unleashes the fucking Yorkshire.

ol Maddo?
ol Maddo?
ol Maddo?
Old?
Now you've done it...

yp01.jpg
Feel the wrath of my yorkshire..
 
I feel I need to chastise some people here.

One of the main reasons I havent posted in a while is because a serious discussion can't happen without people slinging mud at each other. It's a perfectly legitimate suggestion being muddied up by stupid arguments.

In the future when you make a poll it definitely shouldn't be biased such as the "Hurr durr" deal. That said however, I do agree that we shouldn't have ratings in the reports section.

I know some people have said why have ratings at all, people enjoy them that's why....if someone posts something incredibly stupid and you don't want to start an argument much like how this thread is derailing it's a simple way of telling the person you think they are stupid without telling them they are stupid and ruining the thread with a fight. I think a good portion of the regs enjoy the ratings so that's reason enough not to remove them.

However, after saying all of this the reports section need a much bigger iron fist...it shouldn't be for opinion or debate. There is no reason for a regular member to really be reading that forum unless the report is in regards to them, or backing up the report with further proof. So therefor, it really shouldn't be for a regular to rate someones post dumb or whatever particularly when a player might be legit confused as to why they were banned. Ontop of all this, I don't know if any of you have ever been banned from a server unjustly before, but if it's one you've regulared for a while and it comes out of nowhere, one can get quite frustrated. If I am frustrated and I have a bunch of random idiots rating my posts dumb/insulting me when I am trying to dispute it I am going to get a tad more angry and probably be a lot more hostile than if an admin calmly explains what I did.

You people can't even keep civil in a thread debating the reports section, so it's pretty apparent having a rating system that lets you insult people in a forum that is made for disputing bans is beyond most regulars.
 
I feel I need to chastise some people here.

One of the main reasons I havent posted in a while is because a serious discussion can't happen without people slinging mud at each other. It's a perfectly legitimate suggestion being muddied up by stupid arguments.

In the future when you make a poll it definitely shouldn't be biased such as the "Hurr durr" deal. That said however, I do agree that we shouldn't have ratings in the reports section.

I know some people have said why have ratings at all, people enjoy them that's why....if someone posts something incredibly stupid and you don't want to start an argument much like how this thread is derailing it's a simple way of telling the person you think they are stupid without telling them they are stupid and ruining the thread with a fight. I think a good portion of the regs enjoy the ratings so that's reason enough not to remove them.

However, after saying all of this the reports section need a much bigger iron fist...it shouldn't be for opinion or debate. There is no reason for a regular member to really be reading that forum unless the report is in regards to them, or backing up the report with further proof. So therefor, it really shouldn't be for a regular to rate someones post dumb or whatever particularly when a player might be legit confused as to why they were banned. Ontop of all this, I don't know if any of you have ever been banned from a server unjustly before, but if it's one you've regulared for a while and it comes out of nowhere, one can get quite frustrated. If I am frustrated and I have a bunch of random idiots rating my posts dumb/insulting me when I am trying to dispute it I am going to get a tad more angry and probably be a lot more hostile than if an admin calmly explains what I did.

You people can't even keep civil in a thread debating the reports section, so it's pretty apparent having a rating system that lets you insult people in a forum that is made for disputing bans is beyond most regulars.
Glad to see you back. nice input. (although I think I'll pass on teh chastisment)