I considered that. But there's times when admins can't check reports, and older forum users can handle unbans and such themselves, that don't require admin abilities. Such as ban times and rules.maybe ban/report threads just shouldn't be accessible (comment and rate wise) by non-admin members
Instead of this, maybe limit it to regulars or people who can access the Contributor's Club, so instead of everyone and their mother having access of the thread to put their two cents in, we allow access to only a small group of people, usually the ones that actually have their heads on straight.maybe ban/report threads just shouldn't be accessible (comment and rate wise) by non-admin members
Instead of this, maybe limit it to regulars or people who can access the Contributor's Club, so instead of everyone and their mother having access of the thread to put their two cents in, we allow access to only a small group of people, usually the ones that actually have their heads on straight.
Instead of this, maybe limit it to regulars or people who can access the Contributor's Club, so instead of everyone and their mother having access of the thread to put their two cents in, we allow access to only a small group of people, usually the ones that actually have their heads on straight.
No because people can have evidence to present regarding the case.
perhaps there should be a new rule where members that post unhelpful comments on ban/report threads intentionally will be punished under the rule "spamming", or someshitfuckidontknow.I considered that. But there's times when admins can't check reports, and older forum users can handle unbans and such themselves, that don't require admin abilities. Such as ban times and rules.
It isn't in the least-fucking-bit difficult to say that you're sorry they broke the rules, but that's what they are, and we enforce them. They don't have to know that they're dumb, because that just makes them go around and trash talk us.In which case they should know everything thinks they are dumb.
It isn't in the least-fucking-bit difficult to say that you're sorry they broke the rules, but that's what they are, and we enforce them. They don't have to know that they're dumb, because that just makes them go around and trash talk us.
One would hope that others would recognize the stupidity, but everyone continually doing that is building a goddamn brigade of people who all agree alongside said idiot.
There is no reason for us to treat people we ban like shit, regardless of how they treat us or how they act.
Perhaps we should stop them, then.I'm talking about the ones with utterly pathetic appeals. If it gets denied they are just going to trash talk us anyway. I don't think they should be treated like shit either. But 6 forum members rating their pathetic appeal "dumb" isn't going to change anything.
And like I said it won't stop stupid/pointless comments.
How about everyone here just give bad ratings to troll posts in the bans/reports section and create a culture that discourages it in the first place.
Hey, look. I get that. I'm saying that why is it SO BAD to be a passive-agressive asshole in that one part of the site rather than all of it? Don't all people who come here to post deserve a 'decimal of respect'? Shouldn't we, as a whole, just you know...not encourage people to be dicks?Because a significant amount of people come here to contest their bans. They're usually ignorant and don't know the rules and don't have much play time, admittedly, but that doesn't change the fact that they deserve a decimal of respect, which I wouldn't understand most non-admins who don't give 2 shits about how we look to understand.
Shouldn't we, as a whole, just you know...not encourage people to be dicks?
How about everyone here just give bad ratings to troll posts in the bans/reports section and create a culture that discourages it in the first place.
Writing "hurr durr" on the voting option you disagree with doesn't make your point more valid
Thank you for being a perfect example why we shouldn't have them.Writing "hurr durr" on the voting option you disagree with doesn't make your point more valid.
I vote keep the dumb ratings because its funny.