You, accidentally or purposefully, clipped out of context that this player had two bans prior to the one issued by Sakiko, both of which have reports filed on the forumI've had it happen to me, and I laugh at it.
Never made a report about it because I know they are just having fun and most of the time, they don't do it the next round. But if they do then I will speak up about it before I retaliate in nature. But can't be said for all.
Perhaps I am just aware of taking responsibility and knowing that if they made it across the platforms first before I did, then that's my loss.
If you deep dive into their last discipline, an admin actioned on them without a report. I never met them.
Not really great in adminstrating (leading) if your discipline was not effective, leading them to repeat.
Please right this wrong and revert it to a day for a fair chance of Pirate learning.
https://www.skial.com/sourcebans/index.php?p=banlist&advType=steamid&advSearch=[U:1:1026663179]
https://www.skial.com/threads/abdullah-disconnecting-as-hale-to-avoid-minigame.123165/
https://www.skial.com/threads/abdullah-leaving-humi-as-hale.123340/
If standard length was followed, his current ban would be one month, Sakiko only issued a one day ban.
Sakiko plays on the deathrun server frequently. She was playing on the exact date as the ban you clipped. Perhaps she witnessed him grief directly? Maybe someone PM'ed her. She would not slap a ban on a random player out of no where.
Players who are intelligent enough to come back to the same server after being banned once or twice are smart enough to know they're doing something to attract the bans, and chat is spammed telling players to read and follow the server rules. There are players who are willing to learn, and players who are not. You or me can not make that judgement toward either player, it's on them. The increments in ban lengths are supposed to encourage players away from repeatedly breaking the rules.
