[Skipped over technical shit, goes straight to imagining Bottiger facepalming at his comp over stupidity]
I'd like to challenge my ban
- Thread starter capt cole 117
- Start date
-
If you are not the person that was banned/muted, you are only allowed to post evidence. Trash talk is unnecessary.
Nooooooo bottiger got a concusion.
But in all seriousness their real mistake was not researching the topic before trying to prove other people wrong, god know's we've all made that mistake though, so I can't really fault the people that came on here trying to defend capt.
Don't really appreciate them essentially calling us stupid though.
Lol.
I leave one little comment in his forum and they lock the thread, I don't even get a chance to defend myself, talk about pussies.
http://forum.mikelat.com/index.php?topic=1216.30
I still vote for this guy to still be banned, he wouldn't have gone through all this effort if he hadn't cheated. Skial servers just have less latency and all the settings that he likes, but he cheated thinking he wouldn't get caught, and so should suffer the consequences.
I leave one little comment in his forum and they lock the thread, I don't even get a chance to defend myself, talk about pussies.
http://forum.mikelat.com/index.php?topic=1216.30
I still vote for this guy to still be banned, he wouldn't have gone through all this effort if he hadn't cheated. Skial servers just have less latency and all the settings that he likes, but he cheated thinking he wouldn't get caught, and so should suffer the consequences.
Photek
Rage-Inducing Forum Troll
![[TC]CreepingDeath](/data/avatars/m/0/26.jpg?1352268746){kind=avatar}
You would be lying. The topic is not locked, nor will it be locked. Unless you wish to break decency rules and go beyond your initial post.
Also, if the software isn't broke then why are you having multiple false detections and there is even a thread on the detection software forum about the confidence of auto_trigger 1 and 2. I understand that sometimes software doesn't do what you want it to do, but the blind faith put into a 3rd party module when you can use your own "expertise" to detect these "hackers" should out weigh something that is apparently broken.
You've been invited to, but couldn't, provide evidence of a false detection. What makes you think that you have any credibility when all you do is parrot the same lines over and over again? There are thousands of players on the servers but only a handful are having problems. If the program is so flawed, why isn't it registering events constantly? Why can't you recreate a false positive with all of your "knowledge" of the program?
Lord Killington
Legendary Skial King
Seriously starting to think this guy's unban should be revoked. He's not doing himself any favours.
Its already been proven, twice now. I don't know how much more evidence you want other than that. I suppose in your sample size you've concluded that there couldn't possibly be more false positives but I'm sure more will surface as it appears this plugin is not written or designed for TF2 (constant rate of fire regardless of button pushing)
I'd highly suggest people record demos(Like we used to down when I was admin of a TF2 server) and then go from there as opposed to relying upon a piece of software that has already failed twice that is known.
In this case it's not known at all that the software failed.
Just get out.
Arguing with Bottiger about coding is one of the dumbest things you can do.
Your friend cheated now he has to pay for it.
He isn't my friend. So don't make assumptions when you don't know me.
If it didn't fail why is Easymode unbanned as well? Obviously the admins didn't bother to check the Valve change log to find out that this trigger_hack they keep talking about is no longer present in TF2. Which is why this plug-in has failed. I realize that some people if not most are not very literate with computer code, but basic boolean logic is pretty easy.
You've proven nothing.
I suggest that you record a demo of yourself triggering a false positive or stop posting here because nobody wants to hear you get on your soapbox to tell us how great of an admin you are.
I'm sorry you can't read the code. I don't know how else to tell you that the code is buggy and doesn't apply to TF2.
I never the one who banned people from the server, I recorded the demos and sent them to the team that worked on the bans/reviewing demos(We had separate teams as we had a lot of servers). That is what servers should do and have done in the past. This isn't a new thing, it is how most servers enforce their bans. Sometimes cheaters slip through sometimes they don't. That is the gamble of running a server that has people who are willing to pay for their "skill" in a F2P game. It should also fall to the community to want to keep the cheaters out; there were ban threads every day about people to be banned, yet few of the community recorded the demos needed for evidence. There has been no evidence in two cases at this point of this software working. Might want to amend the plugin to record demos?
Why is it so difficult to understand that it has NOTHING to do with with the pistol's fire rate?
Listen:
That's as clear as I can make it.
I believe it was Einstein that said, "If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough."
Are you familiar with the term, gasbag?
Right, except he was talking about pistol fire rate originally, now the topic has switched to aimbot, which you should use a demo to record, not a piece of software that clearly has flaws.
I did explain it simply, if you didn't grasp it I'm sorry you don't understand it well enough.
Relating my own experiences to show you how it was done before this software came out. The best bet to catch an aim-botter, which is the new topic apparently, is a demo. Not a piece of software, which can result in false positives.
I was trying to help you by asking you to clarify your point because you haven't made a cogent argument. You're the one that doesn't understand what Bottiger is saying and that's what numerous people, including myself, are telling you. Your new argument about recording demos equates to grasping at straws.
The only conversation I care to have with you is the one in which you provide a demo of yourself triggering a false-positive. Other than that, I don't see any reason why you're still posting here (other than to childishly get the last word - which is sad, really).
