Winnie

Spectacularly Lethal Soldier
Contributor

This suggestion comes as a concern that players are being punished twice for the same infraction and it is negatively impacting the community.
Quarf is the first report that I was involved in witnessing. They were discontent about being muted for a slur by the automute, but they did not repeat after the mute expired. Unfortunately, a report was generated for another mute to be actioned on the player. They have not returned after they were muted again.
Quarf is just one of the many players who choose not to return to Skial. Multiple similar reports are occurring that prevent players from playing in Skial.

Another example is Jebus's report. How can it be considered fair to impose two disciplinary actions when the evidence clearly shows the automute doing its function?

1760929109894.png


The mute/silence was edited to be a day instead by an anonymous administrator.

1760931175929.png
Lastly, the most recent report from Arvense. This player appeared, according to logs, with poor intent.
They were automuted, so the situation at hand was already resolved.

1760930729163.png

Recent reports are resulting similarly. There are just too many times when a player is getting muted again for something they have already been muted for. It's out of control, and it needs to be addressed.
 
I fully agree only as to first offenses as long as one day.

For subsequent offenses the automate time should contribute to the total mute. i.e a 7 day mute should be a 6 day mute to account for a 1 day auto mute by console.
 
I fully agree only as to first offenses as long as one day.

For subsequent offenses the automate time should contribute to the total mute. i.e a 7 day mute should be a 6 day mute to account for a 1 day auto mute by console.

I am aware that automutes are different from human reports, but there really should not be two stacked together.

I can't bring myself to agree that a human report for the same offense should even be 1 day if automute has already resolved.
Sometimes I will observe that automute will action for 1440 minutes. So it is not incapable of handing down a day mute. But if it's less than a report is generated to extend it further, then it's double jeopardy.
 
I'm not sure, honestly. If skial really is as "inclusive" and "against discrimination" as they claim (which, to be fair, they aren't), I don't really have much sympathy for someone who gets a somewhat unreasonably long ban for saying the n-word. No offense, winnie, but I feel like the way you worded this ("has not returned") tries to portray these people as victims, when they wouldn't be banned in the first place if they just weren't racist.
 
I am aware that automutes are different from human reports, but there really should not be two stacked together.

I can't bring myself to agree that a human report for the same offense should even be 1 day if automute has already resolved.
Sometimes I will observe that automute will action for 1440 minutes. So it is not incapable of handing down a day mute. But if it's less than a report is generated to extend it further, then it's double jeopardy.

It depends on the circumstance. I think it depends on the totality of circumstances but a lot of the time the automute would be for saying “the n word” but the report would include automute evasion of saying “f slur against gays” and various voice com infractions.

So I think it should be counted towards time served but the vast majority of the time looking through the reports it’s separate charges and thus not double jeopardy.
 
I'm not sure, honestly. If skial really is as "inclusive" and "against discrimination" as they claim (which, to be fair, they aren't), I don't really have much sympathy for someone who gets a somewhat unreasonably long ban for saying the n-word. No offense, winnie, but I feel like the way you worded this ("has not returned") tries to portray these people as victims, when they wouldn't be banned in the first place if they just weren't racist.

I understand where you are coming from Bryce. And it's not to portray them as victims. It's a loss to the community if we fail to help them adapt to Skial's culture. It's all of our responsibility. In a perfect world, it would be great if every player were knowledgeable of Skial's terms of service. But that is just simply not a realistic standard to welcome each other in. You can discard them for their racist behavior into isolation, but is that really helping them to improve?

It's creating a net-negative result in the player base for Skial, and eventually, players will no longer populate. I wouldn't care if it wasn't. But I care for the greater good of players and Skial as a whole. I'm sorry.

It depends on the circumstance. I think it depends on the totality of circumstances but a lot of the time the automute would be for saying “the n word” but the report would include automute evasion of saying “f slur against gays” and various voice com infractions.

So I think it should be counted towards time served but the vast majority of the time looking through the reports it’s separate charges and thus not double jeopardy.

If statements are not for what the automute detects, then it is not double jeopardy. (Bypasses, different infractions, what automute isn't detecting)
But the suggestion is for reports being generated directly to what automute is detecting. It is if it's directed at the same logs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lucas4647
I don't really have much sympathy for someone who gets a somewhat unreasonably long ban for saying the n-word.

Hard disagree. Rules are rules and an unreasonably long punishment is unreasonable in (almost) every circumstance.
 
There are just too many times when a player is getting muted again for something they have already been muted for. It's out of control, and it needs to be addressed.

Oh no, someone being racist/discriminatory got muted longer than they expected? How will this affect the economy?!

1760929109894.png



The mute/silence was edited to be a day instead by an anonymous administrator.

1760931175929.png

I don't think this admin is exactly "wrong" for extending the mute. Using the hard R as a casual insult isn't just something anyone should simply gloss over. Personally I don't think the 2 hour automute is long enough. It should be a day by default if people are choosing to act childishly in a public space (Skial servers). Which is also what the admins must think; thus, they extend the mute. I see no problem in that.

Especially when you consider this guideline that's in the Admin Reference Guide (that I referenced the previous time discussing this topic):

Ban Lengths

Here are the standard ban lengths. Use longer ban times based on the seriousness of the offense, or if the person plays rarely and would not be affected by a short ban time, or is a repeat offender.

Let's be real, most people that play on Skial nowadays probably aren't veterans or regulars. Yes, they make up a lot of the community, but a good chunk are new players who've never been to Skial. Which also means they wouldn't be affected by a short mute, i.e., a 2 hour mute. I think extending it is a good choice. You never know, they'll probably think it's ok to do it again later or try bypassing a slur the next time. You don't fully realize the people you're defending here and it puts you in a bad light.

Lastly, the most recent report from Arvense. This player appeared, according to logs, with poor intent.
They were automuted, so the situation at hand was already resolved.

If they came with the intent to disrupt the peace of the server, why should their mute extension be an issue? For you, specifically. How does this affect you at all? Why would it matter if someone like this came back to Skial or not?

You claim it's killing the server, but I say these admins are in the right. Why should they let things like this slide? If you want to keep the peace, you must enforce the rules. I do not think simply being muted for 2 hours will teach someone a lesson or that what they say is wrong. Not to mention, they shouldn't be acting like this in the first place. This is just the result of poor parenting; acting a fool on the internet with no regard to others' feelings. Why is it such an issue they get muted longer? Because it's "unfair?" Unfair to these racists? To these people who were never taught right from wrong growing up?

I can't bring myself to agree that a human report for the same offense should even be 1 day if automute has already resolved.

Yes, because someone being muted for 2 hours will surely fix the way they think and see things. They definitely won't just leave and come back later just to be racist again. (I have seen it happen multiple times.)

It's creating a net-negative result in the player base for Skial, and eventually, players will no longer populate.

You are really overexaggerating. And before you bring up the Deathrun EU server to prove your point, that is only one instance and I'm sure it wasn't even majority that stopped playing solely because of that reason. I can't see that being why. It's a stretch to think an entire server died just because "Oh, my favorite regular got muted/banned. Guess I'll stop playing." Maybe they're angry they can't be freely racist on Skial? Then it's a good thing those people stopped playing. Otherwise, why would they be so pissed about moderation? (Aside from infractions in regards to Deathrun specifically, griefing being one. I see how people would stop playing because of that, but I haven't seen a report with "double jeopardy" being the issue.) And also, two of the three reports you mentioned did not come from any DR server, so I don't think you can even use that as an excuse in this case.

Not to mention, a good chunk of reports don't even have this issue. The Skial community as a whole haven't exactly been discussing this topic in particular, so I think it's safe to say it's not as big of a problem as you might think it is.

I think it's really just dependent on the context of the situation. Let's say it's a "regular" that gets muted for an extended time. They were spamming in chat or something, get muted for 2 hours, come to find out the next day they're still muted. I don't think that's okay. But also because they were only spamming. In this context, they weren't racist, so I don't think that's right for them to be muted longer. But then again, they are a regular, at this point they should know not to spam in chat, right? So don't you think it's the fault of the player rather than the admin who extended the mute?

In another situation, let's say some random person who had never played Skial prior to this day joins, says something racist and gets muted for 2 hours, tries coming back the next day to find out they're still muted. Is it really that big of a deal? You have no idea who this person is. They have no impact on the game. Not to mention, since you have no background info on them, who's to say they aren't someone's alt account trying to purposefully annoy people? Would an extended mute for them really be that big of a deal? I don't think so.

And like I said before, I feel like it's common sense to not be racist/discriminatory just for "lols." I get that it's common for gamers to have that type of humor, but it's not exactly normal, and it should absolutely not be normalized by trying to play off their 2 hour mutes as "okay" or "right." 1 day is fine, and that is what they deserve, anyway.

This will be the last thing that I say:

You need to stop trying to tell admins how to do their jobs. I get you're just trying to keep things fair, but it doesn't always need to be. If there's a rule for admins to place longer mutes/bans on people who wouldn't normally be affected by a shorter ban, then I don't think this suggestion is even necessary. Most of the people that get muted aren't regulars. If they're new players, it doesn't really matter if they come back or not. More new people come back everyday. Again, it's really not that big of a deal.

Some of these admins have probably been moderating longer than you've been playing on Skial as a whole. Trust me when I say they know what they're doing when it comes to muting or banning people over being disruptive/racist/discriminatory, and that you just look stupid trying to defend these people. See the bigger picture.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Aeryn and thlaspi
I feel like Arctic Dino’s point is correct for almost all cases. I haven’t been able to find a automate double jeopardy but I’ve seen votemutes but those are 2 hours so I don’t feel it has the same effect.
 
Heyy, stay away from my reports will ya Winnie. Your assistance is not needed nor required.

My report was not because the n-word that triggered the automute. That was handled already, muting because of that would not be feasible
(mostly because it's just too much work)

You somehow fail to understand this.
You seem to think that the player was entitled to a bulk discount.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Aeryn
@creep @arvense

I think the word you both seem to be wanting for to describe Winnie’s suggestion is “apologism”

He hasn’t show a case for this theoretical scenario and it has implications for other rulings. No test case plus unspoken implications isn’t the best combo.

But I think in @Winnie ’s hypothetical scenario if it was possible and were to happen would be correct.

-That is to say if someone
-got AUTO (not vote) muted for a censored word; and
- with a follow up report with the resulting punishment of which matched the punishment of the auto mute; then

-there would be double jeopardy.

I take this a step farther and say auto mute punishments should
-run concurrent to the punishment from the exact same resulted report mute for the same infraction; in so far to
-combine the punishment into one sentence as determined by the sentencing guidlines.

Winnie would you happen to have a test case or are we just playing Calvinball with hypotheticals? I say this as the cases you have shown seem to be refuted and are seemingly different from the automute hypothetical you’re describing.
 
Last edited:
I don't bother changing every 2 hour mute into 1 day but if someone gets reported then might as well increase it to the normal length

If someone has 5 or more automutes already and latest one being from a day or two away. Even if expired I will make it 1 month or 3 months and treat them like normal mutes, I've done this for years and it's not going to change
 
Everyone here has vicariously alluded to something that I don’t have an understanding of. How does automute even work?

Do we see every message from a player if they were to be automated. If they were to say the N or F slurs without using evasion characters/spaces do we see the slur I have been assuming people use special characters when I do see it.

Also

I don’t think putting on record that punishments are issued for automate infractions only if reported is necessary. Just like I think criticizing Winnie for the post is unnecessary. No mod is combing chat logs right now just like Winnie is not acting maliciously here. But I do think it’s great players like Winnie can and do suggest rule changes. It was a post just like this that got combing prohibited and that’s the power of democracy in action.
 
Last edited:
Oh no, someone being racist/discriminatory got muted longer than they expected? How will this affect the economy?!
Oh no someone said le bad word! What a heinous crime!

It seems to me that most players aren't that bothered except for a select few. Personally I don't believe anyone should be muted for saying such words unless it's in a negative context which is the way it used to be on Skial during the golden age.

Let's be real, most people that play on Skial nowadays probably aren't veterans or regulars. Yes, they make up a lot of the community, but a good chunk are new players who've never been to Skial. Which also means they wouldn't be affected by a short mute, i.e., a 2 hour mute.
You don't know that.

If they came with the intent to disrupt the peace of the server, why should their mute extension be an issue? For you, specifically. How does this affect you at all? Why would it matter if someone like this came back to Skial or not?
Again you don't know that. Maybe they're just having a bit of banter? Is that not allowed? Going back to my first point you often find that the majority don't really care but there is one killjoy who makes it their goal to report anyone they can just for the sake of it.

Why is it such an issue they get muted longer? Because it's "unfair?" Unfair to these racists? To these people who were never taught right from wrong growing up?
How do you know they are "racists" and not just making a joke? There is clearly difference between going "what's up my niggas" and "kill all niggers"...

You are really overexaggerating. And before you bring up the Deathrun EU server to prove your point, that is only one instance and I'm sure it wasn't even majority that stopped playing solely because of that reason. I can't see that being why. It's a stretch to think an entire server died just because "Oh, my favorite regular got muted/banned. Guess I'll stop playing." Maybe they're angry they can't be freely racist on Skial? Then it's a good thing those people stopped playing.
I really don't understand this mentality. So you'd rather let an entire server die than give them a bit of leeway? Is this your way of "owning the chuds"? I can assure you that none of those edgy players on EU are actual racists they simply like to have fun and escape the real world. They don't want to have to be on edge all game thinking anything they could say might be reported even when it's only in jest.

Some of these admins have probably been moderating longer than you've been playing on Skial as a whole. Trust me when I say they know what they're doing when it comes to muting or banning people over being disruptive/racist/discriminatory, and that you just look stupid trying to defend these people. See the bigger picture.
This is bullshit. I've been playing on Skial longer than any current admin has been moderating it except @KinCryos. I have also probably contributed more than anyone else to Skial. Trust me when I say they don't know what they're doing otherwise Deathrun EU would still be alive.
 
Overpolicing doesn't make the server better. Double jeopardy only serves to dissaude new players from playing. On the other hand, old regulars get muted because someone is too sensitive and can't handle a certain phrase. A janny slapping another punishment on top of that is ridiculous.

In these trying times where Skial servers have become increasingly emptier these past two years, and DR and ZE servers have started dying out, there is no point in appeasing redditors who don't play the server.

This behavior is exactly what made regulars leave on top of their other grievances with how those gamemodes were being handled.
 
Oh no, someone being racist/discriminatory got muted longer than they expected? How will this affect the economy?!



I don't think this admin is exactly "wrong" for extending the mute. Using the hard R as a casual insult isn't just something anyone should simply gloss over. Personally I don't think the 2 hour automute is long enough. It should be a day by default if people are choosing to act childishly in a public space (Skial servers). Which is also what the admins must think; thus, they extend the mute. I see no problem in that.

Especially when you consider this guideline that's in the Admin Reference Guide (that I referenced the previous time discussing this topic):

The guidelines do not account for when an infraction overlaps. It's cruel to allow double punishments to occur point-blank. That's why I created this suggestion for an end to double jeopardy. I am not initially from DR. I come from Dustbowl, and Idle as well. You were not present to grasp the culture of EU speaking of. (What happened to this report? Discipline the pyros for stalling like how it is done in US? Or discipline the salty hale?) I haven't witnessed wrongdoings to care to generate a report of so not sure what the point is for falsely accusing me to be in a bad light of racism.

You need to stop

Nope. I understand that you are comfortable with the culture now. I can be too. Like it or not, there will be no players left if it continues to decline. That's what it is, and if EU could be wiped out in just a few days, then other servers are at risk. I would actually stop if you were just as concerned about Skial losing players so we can strategize together about this on a resolution before it gets to this:

we-did-it-we-saved-the-city.gif