It really depends on each scenario. I have a report to back this.
https://www.skial.com/threads/pandemictrauma-nazi-swastika-objector.124555/
This player was displaying a swastika sign while the map was set to Berlin before the report was generated. The player did not change their sign once the map changed; thus, the report was made. If you don't know what the map looks like, here are a few preview images from GameBanana:

The gesture "
stop overpolicing" emphasizes that someone
on this map is being reported for a swastika sign.
Would the report be approved? Most likely, if this context were to be missing from the report. And if the player was not made aware of being reported to defend themself. It would be approached from a universal standpoint by all admins. (How would admins be able to respond to a defense if the user stated that this map has swatiskas too? Remove the map, even if the replay value is strong? Only Bottiger has access to adding or removing maps.)
[
This is where and why the suggestion spawns in relevance]
This is just one isolated case. Each one is unique and has separate servers. It asks if the universal order should remain as the standard if each culture is different. Skial has the integrity to uphold these suggestions and maintain transparency for all, which makes it so great. I would like to see changes if cultures continue to differentiate from each other.