Cream Tea
Banned
It's really not the end of the world if someone does this and they certainly should not be getting six month bans for it. These draconian punishments are killing deathrun.
I wasn't even talking about you specifically but thanks for emphasizing my point about people who don't actually playing the game mode still actively deciding the future of how others get to enjoy it.then why did i say something else that sounded like a dr player would say? you're strange uh huh
intended mechanic=/=unintentional trolling ability.Dropping respawn coin should not result in a ban whatsoever. There is no difference between me dropping respawn coin on supermarket, or me choosing to shred the cheats on playstation.
I mean we had this conversation like a thousand times already but everyone agrees the ban was disproportionate, respawn coin isn't even a core mechanic of deathrun because only like 3 maps have them and as a matter of fact, older deathrun maps didn't even have force respawn mechanics in the first place because it was focused on traps, I don't really think that what he did with the respawn coin counts as griefing (although that's just my opinion), and even if it DOES count as griefing the point still stands that the punishment length was way too long. Imo these kinds of issues should be handled with warns, and if they repeat the offense, kick them or ban them for a day or a week at worst but not half a year.
I see where you're coming from, but that shouldn't stop older players who recently come back from having a say, I believe that older players coming back is actually healthy for the gamemode because it introduces people to the future of the game, sure, they may not have been as present in the whole evolution of the gamemode as active players but again, if they want to give dr another shot why not let them in as long as their opinions aren't destructive?Hot take but I think you should actually have played the game mode within the past 6 months to interact with the future of the game mode as far as suggestions go, why should old heads who haven't so much as joined the server in the past 2-3 years get any say in voting for changes that wouldn't affect them but might directly hurt the long term health of the game mode for the people who do actively play it.
a suggestion would be making stripping configs for every map that uses a intel to automatically respawn players regardless of if the coin was griefed or not. But talking to mappers like axelrock360 a lot of them wouldn't be okay with a perceived "change" to their vision of how a map should work regardless of de's thoughts and opinions. So it really comes down to does bottiger care about fixing the problem or pissing off what little mappers are left in the dr community.
I fail to notice how there's a difference between dropping a respawn coin and shredding a 100% which literally respawns everyone?intended mechanic=/=unintentional trolling ability.
the problem is not old heads coming back its them not actively engaging with the media they're voting on. I have no problems with old heads coming back, playing the server and voting, what I do have is people who have publicly admitted they're done with deathrun and haven't connected to the server in years having the same voting power as people who are on daily,weekly, even monthly etc.I see where you're coming from, but that shouldn't stop older players who recently come back from having a say, I believe that older players coming back is actually healthy for the gamemode because it introduces people to the future of the game, sure, they may not have been as present in the whole evolution of the gamemode as active players but again, if they want to give dr another shot why not let them in as long as their opinions aren't destructive?
still waiting for you to reply on what i saidthe problem is not old heads coming back its them not actively engaging with the media they're voting on.
You claim to be anti griefing yet have no problem with shredding ah comment.still waiting for you to reply on what i said
could you explain?You claim to be anti griefing yet have no problem with shredding ah comment.
No thanks, theres more pressing comments to respond to then someone whos argument is "you claim to be anti griefing but don't report people for shredding 100% on ps, I'm so philosophical and thought provoking."could you explain?
could you also explain on that?No thanks, theres more pressing comments to respond to then someone whos argument is "you claim to be anti griefing but don't report people for shredding 100% on ps, I'm so philosophical and thought provoking."
it's already annoying when we don't get respawned once someone goes to dr_bootcamp end and forget to respawn everyone, chose a minigame instead of respawning usBanning for this is absurd really. But i get it, if this is repeated numerous times throughout the current map, it will get irritating. It's mildly annoying, and could be counted by some people as griefing(personally, i don't think it is. Your fault for dying ahem). A week ban is enough for people to start thinking if they want to do this again. More than that? I don't see a point. Maybe a month if it's happening over and over again, but even that is highly debatable since the mentioned "griefing" is easily avoidable by trying to play carefully or not caring as much for the completion of the map you're on(to not get annoyed by it)
The intention in deathrun should be to play the map and give your team the best chance at winning. And yes, this includes Respawn Intels. The problem is that the permission structures for griefing increase as there's no way to know who and what their intentions are once they get the intel. Too many variables and grey areas to consider.Honestly, i feel like the whole Bring Respawn Intel is just so flawed and the only reason why mappers add them is because of DE saying to mappers "Oh umm don't add auto respawn, have players bring an intel for challenge and make respawning more interesting!" Which is so bullshit since According to what people are currently doing with the respawn intel's by just kilbinding at a place with the intel for NOBODY to get it!
I think the warns shouldn't be six month bans unless if it was a repeat offense for so long which is understandable. However, why not trying if they won't listen after 1 Week, month ban?
But honestly i don't feel like the respawn intels chaos are the server fault or players fault, its DE trying to come up with not well thought ideas and then get fucked overload when players start shitting on the logic! I feel like maps should just NOT think about using a respawn intel and stick to auto respawn or respawn toggles but if your trying to make respawning a challenge, THEN FOR THE LOVE OF GOD DO NOT USE AN INTEL!
But if people are just still greifing and its just commonly known on the map, then perhaps scrap the respawn intel and think of other ways!
i dont know why you're pinging me for this as that ban was not a mistake nor have i done a mistake, they picked it up and dropped it in the area where anyone can die.@caramel pinging as they were responsible for that, i'm sure theyve already learned from this mistake as it's been months. if not though
fair enough! although it seems to be excessive in my opinion, but what I've been trying to say is that the guy who was banned did actually get near to the end, so it does make sense that he dropped the intel in an area acknowledging that he's not respawning everyone. while it may be considered griefing, but please do remind that there's some few people who didn't want to respawn everyone in some certain few maps such as bootcamp that has a button for respawning i did get annoyed a bit when they didn't respawn us, but did not care and still played anyway.i dont know why you're pinging me for this as that ban was not a mistake nor have i done a mistake, they picked it up and dropped it in the area where anyone can die.
holding onto the intel or respawn coin and dropping it somewhere no one can get to it is griefing in my opinion than to choose whether or not to revive your team.
i only unbanned them because everyone was going against it and started causing issues in the discord and their last ban was 2 years ago, but im still following the rules regardless since they had previous offences, if they were to have previous offences within the same year i wouldn't have revoked that ban.