my biggest point in this thread is that the forum rules don't extend to all sections of the forums, as they should. I don't care if it stays, I want it to be more regulated because I think that anyone who breaks forum rules (in or out of unmod) should have no place in Skial.It was made with fewer rules, it was the entire point of it, so why would I deny it?
So basically, this is a "make unmod cleaner or we shut it down"?
a very quick (and probably not 100% accurate) tally (counting +/- 0 votes as against) came out toThe only person who can shutdown unmod is bottiger and if it's an evenly split issue, I'm going to go out on a limb and say he won't. Unless you have an obvious showing in favor of shutting it down, it's never going to happen
because they are dumb and non-factswhy you keep rating my posts dumb
a very quick (and probably not 100% accurate) tally (counting +/- 0 votes as against) came out to
34 people in favor of deletion
19 people against
![]()
I edited it because first it was only the gif and no words, i pasted the words back. I then decided to change the gif. I changed no numbers. I discussed in in Teamspeak with multiple people as I counted, they heard the final numbers and you are welcome to count for yourself.Even though you edited the post I'll respond to this.
34+19=53
34/53=.64 or 64%
Tell me again how these are overwhelming odds in favor of removing it.
I edited it because first it was only the gif and no words, i pasted the words back. I then decided to change the gif. I changed no numbers. I discussed in in Teamspeak with multiple people as I counted, they heard the final numbers and you are welcome to count for yourself.
64% is over half. Learn the word "majority"
If you were reading you would realize that the argument really isn't about removing unmod anymore but redefining it.I honestly don't see any downside to keeping Unmod up, but only downsides to removing it. People need a place to act like idiots, and if you don't give them unmod, the stupidity will smear onto the general section which will only result in an increase of deleted posts and warnings handed out.
Sure. But still, the majority of people who have posted in this thread are either a) in favor of removing unmod or b) in favor of redefining the subforum. That's good enough for me.Yes its over half, but learn the word overwhelming. 64% is barely over half. I'd say anywhere between 85-100% is overwhelming.
Private messages. Let people invite into the Conversation the people they want to harass semi-publicly as they wish. If they desire gossip circles so adamantly to break the rules, let them have it. The person being mentioned can leave the conversation. The other people can sit in their cesspools together, where no else is going to have access to them.I honestly don't see any downside to keeping Unmod up, but only downsides to removing it. People need a place to act like idiots, and if you don't give them unmod, the stupidity will smear onto the general section which will only result in an increase of deleted posts and warnings handed out.
I think that the only reason that people do that is because they have unmod to do it inI honestly don't see any downside to keeping Unmod up, but only downsides to removing it. People need a place to act like idiots, and if you don't give them unmod, the stupidity will smear onto the general section which will only result in an increase of deleted posts and warnings handed out.