Thorin Oakenshield

Epic Skial Regular
Contributor
I'm sure I'll get a lot of flak for this, but it's something that can't be ignored.
Skial bans racism, correct? Swastikas, slurs, etc. Being racist isn't illegal in the sense of personal expression, yet Skial bans it even though saying that you "hate X race because of X slur" is technically still covered under free speech.

We've had people banned for six months/a year for posting content of questionable legality(LadyP's situation) even though it was based mostly on technicalities("Well, it could be considered illegal so we'll ban for it.")

So, with those demonstrations of rule enforcement, why do we still allow Lolita/loli?
Last I checked, it's more controversial than compromising photographs of a legal-age female.
It's banned in several countries yet we allow it to invade Skial? It's obscene and very questionable, but the admins won't enforce the "illegal content" part of the rules. Why do we tolerate it?
So my proposal is to add specifically it to the "Banned things" that Skial does not allow on the forums. This is, to put it simply, a suggestion to make it mandatory to take action.
Thank you for your time ladies and gentlemen, and may the odds be ever in your favor.

Update: Texas Penal Code Chapter 43
http://ypdcrime.com/penal.law/article235.htm?#
California Penal Code 311
 
Last edited:

CDAWG

Legendary Skial King
Contributor
+1 it is sick and honestly surprising it is still not bannable. Look, we all have our weird stuff we like sexually. But this? Just no
 
  • Like
Reactions: sov

hXcjedders

Australian Skial God
I believe it's bannable. I never ran across it myself, but if the admin wants to they can ban for it afaik.
 

Party Chocobo

Australian Skial God
Contributor
They can and some do like how Augar got banned but it differs between admins.
I think it should be part of the rules so everyone knows and can't contest it because "IZ NOT IN RULZ PLS UNBAN"
+1
 

Pengy

Legendary Skial King
We already pretty much ban for it, it's just people try to weasel their way out of it with "UNBAN PLZ WASNT IN RULES."
+1
 

Eris

Wicked Nasty Engineer
Contributor
Okay. Where would you drawn the line though?
Lewdness? nuditity? Or would you be banning people for having a spray of an anime character under the age of 18?

Loli doesn't mean porn you know. Kuroneko is 16 and there is porn of her sprayed by users in skial. I didn't she anyone flip there shit here.

Meowcenary sprays his bestiality shit when he joins servers. I don't like it. But I'm not taking to the forum to ban his fetish.
 

KillerZebra

Forum Admin
Contributor
The line is drawn at lolicon porn/nudity . Otherwise it is perfectlly fine to have a lolicon spray. That is how I handle it
 

Eris

Wicked Nasty Engineer
Contributor
The line is drawn at lolicon porn/nudity . Otherwise it is perfectlly fine to have a lolicon spray. That is how I handle it
Then there is no point to this thread if loli is already banned. Why is this here?
 
Last edited:

Thorin Oakenshield

Epic Skial Regular
Contributor
The line is drawn at lolicon porn/nudity . Otherwise it is perfectlly fine to have a lolicon spray. That is how I handle it
This is a suggestion to make action mandatory instead of leaving it to the whims of each admin.

Then there is no point to this thread if loli is already banned. Where is this here?
Because it's not banned, it's currently left up to the individual admin.
E.g, here: http://www.skial.com/threads/appeal-augar.43851/