it means it didn't affect anyone
many stores in north america have a 'no chase policy'
I guess it does look like that.Eh, if you're really in the server when these happen it's not as pathetic. Based on how many you do and the time in which they come in, it looked like you were searching for people to get in trouble.
This suggestion thread has obviously gone off the rails and has turned into an interrogation. No, I am not searching for people to get in trouble. People make they're own trouble and I report it, end of story. This fact doesn't relate to original suggestion.
The original suggestion was if we should have a limit, but the thread was turning into an interrogation.How does it not relate to the original suggestion?
If the limit were put in, people would not be spam reporting folks based off of searches through hlstats.
If you don't want any pushback, why do you ask people who are rating you dumb to comment?
I mean, thats exactly how it is. Some people have been (imo) banned for things said in text chat that they clearly intended as a joke (which everyone in the server knows but people reading only the line chat wouldn't) that others reported them over despite the reporter never having been in the server.Eh, if you're really in the server when these happen it's not as pathetic. Based on how many you do and the time in which they come in, it looked like you were searching for people to get in trouble.
A joke doesn't absolve the person from breaking a rule.I mean, thats exactly how it is. Some people have been (imo) banned for things said in text chat that they clearly intended as a joke (which everyone in the server knows but people reading only the line chat wouldn't) that others reported them over despite the reporter never having been in the server.
I doubt this will pass anyway so it's completely academic.the 6th, 7th and 8th person you want to report just gonna get off scot free? really doesn't make much sense.