I think people -1ing should have to atleast explain why..how can your negative vote matter if you don't elaborate as to why you are negatively voting him?
 
Last edited:
I think people -1ing should have to atleast explain why..how can your negative vote matter if you don't elaborate as to why you are negatively voting him?

As for me, I'll +0 because Ive only played with him for a few minutes and I can't make a judgement off that alone.
Fair enough. I put -1 because he has some apparent vote abuse in his chat logs along with a failure to correct his ban command even after being told about it.

As for putting a +0, why even bother? If you have no opinion either way, why say anything at all?
 
Fair enough. I put -1 because he has some apparent vote abuse in his chat logs along with a failure to correct his ban command even after being told about it.

As for putting a +0, why even bother? If you have no opinion either way, why say anything at all?

I think it's probably said to that people are currently indifferent, but can probably be swayed relatively easily from the applicant's behavior in a short amount of time.
 
Fair enough. I put -1 because he has some apparent vote abuse in his chat logs along with a failure to correct his ban command even after being told about it.

As for putting a +0, why even bother? If you have no opinion either way, why say anything at all?

A fair point indeed, I just wanted to put SOMETHING so it didn't seem like all I was doing was criticizing. I shall edit it out.
 
I'll withdraw the application then and put my +1 behind Munch turbine admin. (however he doesn't play late)

Let me address the allegations

-1
Saw that you tried to mute someone for "bitching the loudest". Don't think you know the rules well enough just yet.

This particular instance the server had 6 screaming children all mic spamming at the same time. I wasn't wearing my headset and it was sitting on the desk a few feet away with volume on 1. Despite this the screeching child could still be heard spamming mic 25-40 times PER MINUTE.

I suppose if you want to call this vote abuse than please do indeed.

Ban command is wrong, application is rather lacking and of course what looks like vote abused pointed out above

Meh, I looked it up. Here's the correction. sm_ban “#[U:1:66091370]” 30 "mic spam"

Fair enough. I put -1 because he has some apparent vote abuse in his chat logs along with a failure to correct his ban command even after being told about it.

It hasn't even been 24 hours. Do you think that I'm sitting around checking my email every 5 minutes to check the status of this?

Ban command is wrong, application is rather lacking and of course what looks like vote abused pointed out above

I suppose it is "lacking". I apologize. heh

and

So, after checking your chat, i see random votemutes, only silencing. and also found this so i am going for -/+0

http://stats.skial.com/stats/hlstats.php?mode=chathistory&player=141495&page=4

WE DONT WANNA HEAR YOUR SHITTY LITTLE PLANS.
a frew secs later
/votemenu silence #[U:1:93917329].

This guy in question "Cheese" has been banned no less than a half dozen times. look him up. He keeps creating new ID's again and again. His previous names include HULK and SNOOP LION. No matter.

Dunno what this means.

86 days. At lest pretend like you know how to behave.
-1.

My 86 DAYS of playing were actually PLAYING. I wasn't sitting in idle server or killing bots.

I think people -1ing should have to atleast explain why..how can your negative vote matter if you don't elaborate as to why you are negatively voting him?

NEVER SAY ANYTHING LOGICAL HERE SIR!

As the people who are voting -1 don't play in the server, and because the forum users grossly out number the people that play in turbine, this seems like a lost cause.

No hard feelings y'all.
 
I'll withdraw the application then and put my +1 behind Munch turbine admin. (however he doesn't play late)

Let me address the allegations



This particular instance the server had 6 screaming children all mic spamming at the same time. I wasn't wearing my headset and it was sitting on the desk a few feet away with volume on 1. Despite this the screeching child could still be heard spamming mic 25-40 times PER MINUTE.

I suppose if you want to call this vote abuse than please do indeed.



Meh, I looked it up. Here's the correction. sm_ban “#[U:1:66091370]” 30 "mic spam"



It hasn't even been 24 hours. Do you think that I'm sitting around checking my email every 5 minutes to check the status of this?



I suppose it is "lacking". I apologize. heh

and



This guy in question "Cheese" has been banned no less than a half dozen times. look him up. He keeps creating new ID's again and again. His previous names include HULK and SNOOP LION. No matter.

Dunno what this means.



My 86 DAYS of playing were actually PLAYING. I wasn't sitting in idle server or killing bots.



NEVER SAY ANYTHING LOGICAL HERE SIR!

As the people who are voting -1 don't play in the server, and because the forum users grossly out number the people that play in turbine, this seems like a lost cause.

No hard feelings y'all.
I know I'm beating a dead horse since you just closed the app, but this pretty much sums up why I -1'd you. You're complaining about mic spammers and the like but I only was able to find two reports made by you via Reporter and a handful made by you. 86 days of play time and a few reports is "lacking" for someone who wants to be an admin. I'm glad you enjoy skial servers, but this tells me you're not admin material at all.
 
I said I'll withdraw, but I didn't say immediately. I understand these things take time

Please unlock the thread, I'd like to see other responses if you don't mind.
 
I said I'll withdraw, but I didn't say immediately. I understand these things take time

Please unlock the thread, I'd like to see other responses if you don't mind.
Untagged.
Let's see if you can manage to get more support from server/forum regs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lordthree
As Chel pointed out, you've only made two reports of someone mic spamming. In addition to that, "bitching" is still not against the rules. Just because a child is on the mic and complaining about something doesn't mean you can vote mute him. It's hardly considered spam at that point. If it gets to the point where he's just screeching without any distinguishable human language, then it's spam.
 
Lordthree has been a part of that server and that community for many years. He is a very popular player, and regular players truly enjoy his presence. I'm not sure which community an admin should be participating in according to your desired qualities, but Lordthree is the co-founder of the steam group specifically devoted to that server and the many people who play on it. He has continually shown himself to be a beneficial influence on the social environment, and does his best to try to stop rule-breaking.

As for him getting the ban question wrong, here is something from fluxcap's application:
/*Edit
*I fixed the ban question. I didn't know that you had to be very clear on why you banning someone.
*Edit 2
*fixed the ban question again.*/

+1
 
  • Like
Reactions: lordthree
As Chel pointed out, you've only made two reports of someone mic spamming. In addition to that, "bitching" is still not against the rules. Just because a child is on the mic and complaining about something doesn't mean you can vote mute him. It's hardly considered spam at that point. If it gets to the point where he's just screeching without any distinguishable human language, then it's spam.

Maybe I wasn't clear when I last addressed this. This was the case. He'd been carrying on for 40 minutes non-stop. I was just hearing screaming coming from headset on desk. If you're able to please look at other votes called on the server around the same time period. I wasn't the only one.

I'm normally not bothered by these sort of things but after that long I thought it would be prudent to call a vote. For the benefit of the server. When I said "Bitching" I meant it as "screaming" I guess. There were so many people "Screaming" that I thought "Bitching" would be a more useful term.

This is why I'm not on forums much. This type of nit-picking
 
Then the question is, why didn't you report him? I'm not nit-picking, either.
I thought it would be democratic to vote. I could have probably called up everyone to overwhelm him with a report, but it seemed more democratic to vote.
 
I think people -1ing should have to atleast explain why..how can your negative vote matter if you don't elaborate as to why you are negatively voting him?

As mittens, the best kitty once said.

"If I wrote +1 you wouldn't ask me why. You would just say "thank you"