Fair enough. I put -1 because he has some apparent vote abuse in his chat logs along with a failure to correct his ban command even after being told about it.I think people -1ing should have to atleast explain why..how can your negative vote matter if you don't elaborate as to why you are negatively voting him?
As for me, I'll +0 because Ive only played with him for a few minutes and I can't make a judgement off that alone.
Fair enough. I put -1 because he has some apparent vote abuse in his chat logs along with a failure to correct his ban command even after being told about it.
As for putting a +0, why even bother? If you have no opinion either way, why say anything at all?
Fair enough. I put -1 because he has some apparent vote abuse in his chat logs along with a failure to correct his ban command even after being told about it.
As for putting a +0, why even bother? If you have no opinion either way, why say anything at all?
-1
Saw that you tried to mute someone for "bitching the loudest". Don't think you know the rules well enough just yet.
Ban command is wrong, application is rather lacking and of course what looks like vote abused pointed out above
Fair enough. I put -1 because he has some apparent vote abuse in his chat logs along with a failure to correct his ban command even after being told about it.
Ban command is wrong, application is rather lacking and of course what looks like vote abused pointed out above
So, after checking your chat, i see random votemutes, only silencing. and also found this so i am going for -/+0
http://stats.skial.com/stats/hlstats.php?mode=chathistory&player=141495&page=4
WE DONT WANNA HEAR YOUR SHITTY LITTLE PLANS.
a frew secs later
/votemenu silence #[U:1:93917329].
86 days. At lest pretend like you know how to behave.
-1.
I think people -1ing should have to atleast explain why..how can your negative vote matter if you don't elaborate as to why you are negatively voting him?
I know I'm beating a dead horse since you just closed the app, but this pretty much sums up why I -1'd you. You're complaining about mic spammers and the like but I only was able to find two reports made by you via Reporter and a handful made by you. 86 days of play time and a few reports is "lacking" for someone who wants to be an admin. I'm glad you enjoy skial servers, but this tells me you're not admin material at all.I'll withdraw the application then and put my +1 behind Munch turbine admin. (however he doesn't play late)
Let me address the allegations
This particular instance the server had 6 screaming children all mic spamming at the same time. I wasn't wearing my headset and it was sitting on the desk a few feet away with volume on 1. Despite this the screeching child could still be heard spamming mic 25-40 times PER MINUTE.
I suppose if you want to call this vote abuse than please do indeed.
Meh, I looked it up. Here's the correction. sm_ban “#[U:1:66091370]” 30 "mic spam"
It hasn't even been 24 hours. Do you think that I'm sitting around checking my email every 5 minutes to check the status of this?
I suppose it is "lacking". I apologize. heh
and
This guy in question "Cheese" has been banned no less than a half dozen times. look him up. He keeps creating new ID's again and again. His previous names include HULK and SNOOP LION. No matter.
Dunno what this means.
My 86 DAYS of playing were actually PLAYING. I wasn't sitting in idle server or killing bots.
NEVER SAY ANYTHING LOGICAL HERE SIR!
As the people who are voting -1 don't play in the server, and because the forum users grossly out number the people that play in turbine, this seems like a lost cause.
No hard feelings y'all.
Untagged.I said I'll withdraw, but I didn't say immediately. I understand these things take time
Please unlock the thread, I'd like to see other responses if you don't mind.
As Chel pointed out, you've only made two reports of someone mic spamming. In addition to that, "bitching" is still not against the rules. Just because a child is on the mic and complaining about something doesn't mean you can vote mute him. It's hardly considered spam at that point. If it gets to the point where he's just screeching without any distinguishable human language, then it's spam.
I thought it would be democratic to vote. I could have probably called up everyone to overwhelm him with a report, but it seemed more democratic to vote.Then the question is, why didn't you report him? I'm not nit-picking, either.
-1
And i don't have to explain shit as to why to nobody.
I think people -1ing should have to atleast explain why..how can your negative vote matter if you don't elaborate as to why you are negatively voting him?