Declined Admin App: Jwso

Status
Not open for further replies.
No, definitely not. Makes a point to constantly troll people, almost reaching the point of harassment. Likes to stir up trouble wherever he can. He is banned on TS for poke spamming and constant channel creation (causing many alerts for people who have them on).
-1
 
-1 While i have seen his actions on the forums, i haven't seen any activity on the skial servers with him.
EDIT: I take that back, the guy is a goddamn troll.
 
Last edited:
+0, you got admin before, but there have been some negative feedback from the posts above.
 
+1 Likes to mess around with people in the casual part of the forums but isn't terrible when it comes to business

-1's are probably from people who fuss over silly little things. Like alerts that are mostly turned off or jokes that crack him up.
 
JWSO's never actually bothered me. In fact, he helped me get around the forums my first day, and since then I haven't seen anything gone (too) wrong.
+1?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chance
I would put a +1 if I saw anything good but it looks like he hasn't responded since last month. I'm going to put a +/-0 for now. If he's gotten better, great. If not, that's a shame.
 
-1 for now.

Ever since Zebra posted that picture on your reason to ban someone for something that isn't even close to breaking Skial rules I don't think you should be trusted with admin powers (you even made a poor excuse because there was "not much banning being done in 2011").

Plus, considering your warning history and how others say you troll on TS and on the forums you wouldn't represent Skial very nicely. If you're going to be a Skial admin you have to represent the community itself professionally, even if some of the other admins don't that doesn't mean you shouldn't.

Before I forget, your chat history isn't very impressive either.
 
Last edited:
Apple 3.14 said:
Ever since Zebra posted that picture on your reason to ban someone for something that isn't even close to breaking Skial rules I don't think you should be trusted with admin powers (you even made a poor excuse because there was "not much banning being done in 2011").
Click to expand...
You do realize there were like two servers when I first became admin? "Bad" as a ban reason was just because there were more words and I forgot to use quotation marks. There were no clear guidelines either, so some admins would for example kick people for taunting (cinic).
 
Jwso said:
You do realize there were like two servers when I first became admin? "Bad" as a ban reason was just because there were more words and I forgot to use quotation marks. There were no clear guidelines either, so some admins would for example kick people for taunting (cinic).
Click to expand...

And that's your other excuse to justify your past actions? My -1 will stay. You honestly will not be a good admin if you still think that that ban was "okay to do" even though the player you banned did not break the rules.

Also, if you cannot live up to today's expectations as an admin, barely anyone would want you as one.
 
Apple 3.14 said:
And that's your other excuse to justify your past actions? My -1 will stay. You honestly will not be a good admin if you still think that that ban was "okay to do" even though the player you banned did not break the rules.

Also, if you cannot live up to today's expectations as an admin, barely anyone would want you as one.
Click to expand...
As I wrote earlier, there was a reason for the ban (bad language, IIRC) but it only listed as "bad" because I didn't use quotation marks in the command.
Dunno about today, but not all admins used to have access to Sourcebans. That, and because nobody cared, is why it was never fixed.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom
Back