should advertising hacks be considered a bannable offense?
- Thread starter Ruelel
- Start date
๖ۣۜZaldarius
Gore-Spattered Heavy
should be no question, its basically encouraging people to break server rules. cut it now before it gets ugly in my opinion
SgtGiraffe
Legendary Skial King
![[Interrogator]](/data/avatars/m/3/3342.jpg?1547454508){kind=avatar}
What do you by us, like everyone or a couple people?
On topic:
I always thought they were just fake hacks to see if people would really look for something that doesn't exist
Shiny Charizard
Legendary Skial King
Admins are supposed to act responsible and accountable for their actions, some stupid jokes a non admin can get away with but that the Admin's can't.
You're the example for the player base and a stupid chuckle for yourself will hurt yourself and the community in the longrun, aka nonregulars thinking you actually hack and emitting a detrimental vibe altogether.
Having those binds will only aggravate a player as I don't think anyone who just got headshotted repeatedly would lol at a hack advert.
Shenanigans like that only cause trouble and doublestandards.
You are not above any rules as an admin, infact you are subject to more.
Course we should. Some people are going to see the sites in chat, and actually use the hack. (you're more likely to get a virus than a hack) The more people do that, the more people get banned for doing it, the more people get banned, the less people play on our servers.
If this does pass, then you guys had better enforce this on admins as well.
I posted my opinion on this awhile back, the thread's either deleted or in unmod where I can't find it. So I'll just go without quoting it.
This is the first time you've ever played on Skial servers.
There's a playerpulling off incredibly good shots.
He repeatedly adversities hacking sites after said shots.
You go to report the guy thinking he's hacking.
Oh look, the "hacker" is actually an admin.
How would you feel about Skial?
I'm not singling out Zebra, because apparently Mittens has a bind just like it.
If you're going to ban for it, you need to enforce this rule on everyone. Not just certain people, just because you're an admin doesn't mean you can break rules.
I'm putting my money on this not passing because it would mean either punishing people for it, or setting a double standered for players.
If this does pass, then you guys had better enforce this on admins as well.
I posted my opinion on this awhile back, the thread's either deleted or in unmod where I can't find it. So I'll just go without quoting it.
This is the first time you've ever played on Skial servers.
There's a playerpulling off incredibly good shots.
He repeatedly adversities hacking sites after said shots.
You go to report the guy thinking he's hacking.
Oh look, the "hacker" is actually an admin.
How would you feel about Skial?
I'm not singling out Zebra, because apparently Mittens has a bind just like it.
If you're going to ban for it, you need to enforce this rule on everyone. Not just certain people, just because you're an admin doesn't mean you can break rules.
I'm putting my money on this not passing because it would mean either punishing people for it, or setting a double standered for players.
Would the same apply to other binds, or just 'hacking.com' binds?
Like, some people bind "Shut your whore mouth when I'm talking" when they kill someone, shouldn't the same rule be applied to the people who do that, as well as people who bind HACK4FREE.com? It isn't exactly the same thing, but then you'll have people making unban threads saying "how come the guy who spams binds after a kill didn't get banned, and I did?"
Like, some people bind "Shut your whore mouth when I'm talking" when they kill someone, shouldn't the same rule be applied to the people who do that, as well as people who bind HACK4FREE.com? It isn't exactly the same thing, but then you'll have people making unban threads saying "how come the guy who spams binds after a kill didn't get banned, and I did?"