• If you are not the person that was banned/muted, you are only allowed to post evidence. Trash talk is unnecessary.

gus

Unremarkable User
Link to your ban from here https://www.skial.com/sourcebans/
Please click on Ban List or Comm List and click advanced search.

https://www.skial.com/sourcebans/index.php?p=commslist&advSearch=[U:1:856173958] &advType=steamid

Why should you be unbanned?
It's been nine months since I've been perma-muted

It's hard to communicate while muted and I can't really interact with my team at all

Permanent ban is a long time for saying 1 word. I know I was stupid for implying something without any proof whatsoever that could ruin someone's life.

Would be nice if I could nominate maps again :(
 
Considering he made the slander against me, I will handle it

Acknowledge exactly what you did and I'll consider lifting your mute
As I said in the repeal request, I acknowledge it was stupid and wrong to imply that you were a pedophile. That being said, I was not inherently serious in my statement of "jermaphobe" and never intended it as a serious allegation against you. I don't know anything about you that could, in any way, substantiate my 'accusation'. If anything Shadouu, the user in my previous appeal, should have been punished as well for saying "arent there pedo skial admins or something/". That is in the past though and I've lost all interest in entertaining the initial post.

Joking about any person being a pedophile is childish and incredibly irresponsible in today's environment when it is a serious issue. I acknowledge where I went wrong and will refrain from doing such a thing in the future.
 
Just a friendly reminder of this user's attitude in their previous appeal. :)

https://www.skial.com/threads/tf2-appeal-gus.99612/#post-839699
My 'attitude' was shocked for being permanently muted for saying one word. There wasn't any sign of disrespect on my part, simply a disagreement in proper punishment.

Just a friendly reminder that in my opinion it's infantile and rude to involve yourself in such a discussion you're not involved in, considering the tone of the situation. Considering the fact you're not even staff makes it increasingly strange how you involve yourself in such matters.