SFW Furry thread.
- Thread starter Fang
- Start date
- Status
No, I was implying the distinction should've been obvious to them since their avatar is of a loli catgirl receiving some uncouth treatment, aka loli porn, aka they browse sexually explicit underage hentai characters without being a pedophile IRL (I assume.)
They aren't child molesters technically, but with those pedophiliac tendencies, it does most certainly does make them a pedophile.
Doesn't surprise me.
If they're a solid 1 out of 10 it's unlikely any other human would endure touching them.
And with those furry tendencies, it most definitely means they want to fuck animals.
You see how this goes both ways?
Let's not get into a debate as to whether or not loli/shota porn makes you a pedophile IRL or not, as has been said correlation=/=causation, as far as the law is concerned it is still a sketchy subject.
Your avatar on here, I'm too lazy to bother with your steam.
Yet the fact remains that your avatar on here is a catgirl loli being sodomized with a tail toy, are you a pedophile IRL? If not the distinction should be obvious to you.
Reports say a lot of things. Doesn't mean they're always true. I read a report that 3% of the US population is homosexual. And 3% of the U.S. population is a convicted or open pedophile. I don't believe the report. But some may.
You would've had to reverse image searched to find my uncropped profile pic. That shows activeness.
Here is a gold star.
Don't you have a my little pony thread to be posting in. Intelligent discussion has no room for an adult that watches a show for children. You are literally are autism incarnate.
You have a loli avatar, you're not really in a position to self-style yourself as an intellectual with the moral and intellectual high-ground sufficient enough to brow beat your peers, just saying.
This isn't in unmod, dear, and nowhere in my comment did I make a racist remark, again, you're not as intelligent as you seem to think you are.
;3
(-TG-)SvenPhantom
Server-Clearing Cynic
- Status