chuckwagon

Legendary Skial King
Contributor
The passing of Prince has me thinking retrospectively. There is a lot I would like to write, more than is appropriate for a Facebook post. Probably just the right amount for a blog post, for a blog that doesn't exist, because people don't ordinarily care about what I think.

Video Killed the Radio Star. I brought that up with my wife tonight. I feel like the prophesy came true- just a few decades later than prophesied. The great talents of the 80s and 90s mastered the art of the music video, but they were still on heavy RADIO rotation. Great artists of the 80s and 90s were able to attack from two fronts, radio and video.

But right now, music videos only exist on youtube and vimeo. Where you search for what you want to watch. Gone are the MTV days where, for better or worse, you watched the videos that MTV decided were good. The music videos where curated for you. And the top ones where placed on heavy rotation.

So far this year we have lost David Bowie, Merle Haggard, Glenn Frey, and now Prince. 2015 saw the loss of B.B. King, Lemmy Kilmister, Scott Weiland. Whitney Houston and Michael Jackson have been lost within the decade. Most of these artists left an indelible impression on society, for most in the form of music video.
I find that I keep using the word "artist". I look at the current pop starts of the charts, and I am not sure if that word can apply anymore. We have a few treasured relics. Bob Dylan, who shares a home state with our current inspiration, Prince, survives as a reminder of folk/activist music/singer-songwriter days of old. Bruce Springsteen is currently touring providing his one-of-a-kind live experience. But what happens when we lose Bob, and the Boss, and the like? What is the future of music?

These are the credits given to Prince on his "Purple Rain" album (according to AllMusic.com): Arranger, Bass, Composer, Guitar, Keyboards, Primary Artist, Producer, Vocals, Vocals (Background). Obviously Prince was one of the most prolific musicians of his era, but all of the other musicians that I named earlier are also intimately tied to the music that they create.

Where is this generation's Prince? Where is this generation's artist? I feel that this generation is only able to produce acts, and not artists. It is a generation of artisans reproducing art so skillfully in that way that they are told will make everyone the most money.

There used to be album artistry. "Purple Rain" being a perfect example. An entire piece of work to take in, not a collection of pasta singles being thrown at the wall to see what sticks.

The only exception I have seen in recent times is Kendrick Lamar's "To Pimp A Butterfly" I am not ordinarily a rap fan, but even if we pretend that the feel of incorporating free-form/be-bop jazz into rap and actually using it to mimic the pace and flow of the rhymes isn't revolutionary, we are still ignoring the cohesiveness of the album. Yes, it CAN stand alone track by track, but anyone that has heard it front to back would never want it to be.

I am nervous to see where the future of music is headed. The sun is setting on the current stable of music heroes. Will new heroes-- new 'artists' emerge, or will the definition of 'musical artist' be redefined? Will society be celebrating the career of Taylor Swift's smattering of brainless pop songs when she dies?
 
Music, along with entertainment in general, is one of the things that changes the most with each generation. It's unlikely that we're going to get a new Frank Sinatra since it's not what most people who listen to music these days (i.e kids and teens) want.
I don't think good music is dead, it's just a different style than what it used to be. It's hard to find new groups and artists who do the same kind of music that was popular years ago because it's always evolving, people are creating new songs and becoming famous according to which genre is most popular at the moment.
There's probably a finite number of music styles that are going to emerge in the future, but as I said, it's always circled around what is popular at the time, like pop and rap is at the moment.
I mean, in a way, would you be happy to hear this kind of music on every few stations when you turned your radio on?

 
  • Like
Reactions: chuckwagon
I understand what you are saying. From my perspective, as a musician, I have performed, and enjoy listening to these musical styles. I realize that I am an outlier in the question that you proposed.

But to my question about artistry- several of the people in this video were composers or other collaborators on the music. I feel that modern pop music are performers singing/performing music that more talented people wrote.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Toxik
From my experience, I am young but I honestly prefer the older music. I find the modern music to be just "mashed up noise.

And of course these "older" songs I refer to are from the 70s/80s.
 
But to my question about artistry- several of the people in this video were composers or other collaborators on the music. I feel that modern pop music are performers singing/performing music that more talented people wrote.
Oh definitely, when you look at the fact that it took 5 people to write Justin Bieber's song "Baby" or 10 to write Chris Brown's "Don't Wake Me Up", both of which have very little lyrics and very repetitive rhymes, it definitely feels like song nowadays are more crowd-pleasers/money-makers than made by the artists because it's what they love, which is pretty sad
 
Since I've had dealings with the music industry, I can tell you a few disturbing things.

Talent alone doesn't get you very far anymore. You can practice and gig like no tomorrow but if you don't know the right people, you won't get anywhere. It's all about connections and money now which is incredibly unfortunate for those who work their ass off to become amazing musicians. That said, places like YouTube and other media sites are helping those people get their music out there. So even though those people won't be as high up as Katy Perry or Kanye West when it comes to money and popularity, they can still make a decent living selling their music online. I'm not going to say it's the same for every musician, though. I went to school with some really good musicians and they're making bank from doing gigs because they were lucky enough to meet the right people.

As for music nowadays(in my own opinion, of course), it takes five or even more people to write a simple, and incredibly annoying, song like Justin Bieber's "Baby" and frankly, it's ridiculous. It also makes me cringe. But fortunately, there are plenty of musicians around like Stevie Wonder, Steven Tyler, Santana, and many more that made a lot of damn good songs that we can buy and stream. And Bruno Mars ain't that bad, either. Personally, I think he's taking after Michael Jackson a little bit. But that's just me.

It's also a great thing that beginning musicians can easily cut record companies out completely and produce music on their own AND sell their music anywhere. Record companies are known for wanting nothing but money. Well, most. Indie record companies seem to end up doing better than major labels. At least nowadays.

Anyways, that's my take on the music industry. Music now seems to be a bit too bland but we have the technology to enjoy the classics.
 
The problem with current mass music media is that it almost completely caters to what Chuck brought up: Pop, rap and R&B. As Marilyn Manson put it, Rock is dead. Musicians who put their heart and soul into their instruments and create a truly exciting album/live show aren't picking up steam on the top tracks anymore.

Last time I remember people talking about a rock album, it was Green Day's 21st Century Breakdown. It was an amazing album and deserved all the acclaim it got, but to say that nothing has topped that album (at least in the rock genre, hell even metal and any other genre where musicians actually play their instruments) since then is a ludicrous statement.

Mass media places way too much focus on the catchy, repetitive singles put out by pop stars (everyone remembers when Happy was being played on fucking absolutely everything for a good six month) and completely ignores the rock genres. Just look at the radio stations your city offers. Mine has three rock stations and probably 8-10 "new" music stations.

I honestly don't think rock or metal will ever come back to prominence. They will maintain a large fan base for sure, they wouldn't be putting out music if it wasn't financially stable. However, their popularity is almost entirely tied down to the niche groups who enjoy that music, which is slowly disintegrating into people who rather prefer pop and rap hits.