Gigz

Face-Melting F2Per
Contributor
..............
..........
.........
.......
.....




tumblr_lun0chXd3p1qmyt38o1_500.jpg

for you my friends, because I'm not old enough to drink.

Drink up :p
 
  • Like
Reactions: CiNiC and Sinnx
So how does this not qualify for a ban? Have to be consistent if you are going to use harsh punishment for minor offenses.

Edit: No offense to you Giggelz you are cool. Was just trying to make a point.
 
Judging by the lack of responses I will just assume all administrative punishment is subject to bias and that I should not expect real consistency in rule enforcement.
 
chill brah, it just got implemented. this joke will stop being funny in about 10 minutes anyway
 
chill brah, it just got implemented. this joke will stop being funny in about 10 minutes anyway
One user banned(1 day). One user not banned(zero days). I am not upset over the rule. I am upset that it is being selectively enforced. In my opinion both users should have gotten a warning since it is a new rule.
 
well I mean it was clearly a joke

McGama's was too, but I'm also sure he won't be banned for long. hopefully, anyway. they'll take care of shit.

I've personally been put in timeout for something about as arbitrary and selective, if not moreso.

Knowing McGama he's probably not even all that upset about it anyway
 
One user banned(1 day). One user not banned(zero days). I am not upset over the rule. I am upset that it is being selectively enforced. In my opinion both users should have gotten a warning since it is a new rule.

There is nothing being selectively enforced. McGama said he was going to leave in the thread body because everyone else was doing it.

Please stop with the alt-account I can rant all I want with Skial attitude now thanks.
 
There is nothing being selectively enforced. McGama said he was going to leave in the thread body because everyone else was doing it.

Please stop with the alt-account I can rant all I want with Skial attitude now thanks.
There was absolutely nothing disrespectful or personal about my post. I merely voiced a concern.
 
There was nothing personal about it, but you are still trying to make it look like the rules are being applied unfairly with quotes like "asinine use of power".
 
(Rescinded due to additional info)
There is nothing being selectively enforced. McGama said he was going to leave in the thread body because everyone else was doing it.
According to what I can see... (unless McGama edited his post) all he said was...
POOPING IS FUN
Which is some sort of crude humor, basically the same as what Gigglez did in this thread. Seems like selective enforcement to me... Please correct me if I have made a mistake.
 
According to what I can see... (unless McGama edited his post) all he said was...

Which is some sort of crude humor, basically the same as what Gigglez did in this thread. Seems like selective enforcement to me... Please correct me if I have made a mistake.
he did edit his post.
 
well I mean it was clearly a joke

McGama's was too, but I'm also sure he won't be banned for long. hopefully, anyway. they'll take care of shit.

I've personally been put in timeout for something about as arbitrary and selective, if not moreso.

Knowing McGama he's probably not even all that upset about it anyway
i got banned for.a day in the past i almost killed.myself because i could not check my alerts they were there just to mock me
 
he did edit his post.
I had not seen he edited the post. Nor did I know about the new rule until that thread. This was not on the front page (Which something this big definitely should have been). Sorry if I misjudged the use of power. I do however hold my ground that this should be on the front page or somehow made more obvious for those who are not as of yet aware of it.
 
You all don't seem aware that selective application of rules and laws is called being just and fair, as the mitigating circumstances always matter.
Thats why Judges have the final say, not police officers.