JohnnyGaloshes

Banned
Contributor
Summary:
Spamming chat

Player Name:
<>Annoying joy<>

SteamID:
[U:1:232216246]
https://stats.skial.com/#summary/player/SteamID/All/[U:1:232216246]
https://www.skial.com/sourcebans/index.php?p=banlist&advType=steamid&advSearch=[U:1:232216246]
https://www.skial.com/sourcebans/index.php?p=commslist&advType=steamid&advSearch=[U:1:232216246]

Time:
now

Servers:
2FORT | NY | Fast

Detailed Explanation / Screenshots / Demos:
He binds "Another satisfied customer" and "lol" after each and every kill. Very excessive. Has previous bans also for it.

https://www.skial.com/sourcebans/index.php?p=commslist&searchText=[U:1:232216246]&Submit
 
I know you're gonna get mad, but I'll take the blame for it anyways. He's not chat spamming. He also does not have "bans" for it, since those are all vote silences and could technically be vote abuse for all any knows.

His binds are spaced enough apart that they aren't spam.
 
I know you're gonna get mad, but I'll take the blame for it anyways. He's not chat spamming. He also does not have "bans" for it, since those are all vote silences and could technically be vote abuse for all any knows.

His binds are spaced enough apart that they aren't spam.

Yes, silences, i said bans. You are correct.

This doesn't surprise me from you, however, let's see what other admins say.
 
Yes, silences, i said bans. You are correct.

This doesn't surprise me from you, however, let's see what other admins say.
I knew what you meant by bans. He doesn't have any admin silences was my point. :blush:

You'll be waiting an awful while for other admins to have input, when he isn't chat spamming. Either way, I'm joining 2fort+ to check on your other report.
 
Yes, silences, i said bans. You are correct.

This doesn't surprise me from you, however, let's see what other admins say.

We're a bit more relaxed when it comes to what we consider spam than other communities are

Taking a glance over his chatlogs I couldn't classify that as spam since it doesn't look like something that would be seriously disrupting a active chat