Declined Admin App: SnowyDevil

[SnowyDevil]

+1

Thanks for support devil!

 

[Reedgreat]

A lot of faces in his chat, seems a bit immature from what I saw when I was reading through it.

-1

 

[SnowyDevil]

A lot of faces in his chat, seems a bit immature from what I saw when I was reading through it.

-1

Just becuase i make a few faces in chat, every now than does not mean im immature.

 

[♢Luna♢☕]

+1

 

[Valdemi]

+1

 

[san7890]

+1 Playing time is low, but otherwise led to believe is good fit

 

[SnowyDevil]

+1

+1

+1 Playing time is low, but otherwise led to believe is good fit

Thanks for support guys.

 

[Dolph1n]

I've reported quite a few people which is time consuming and annoying as some rule breakers are aware that I'm taking screenshots at some points, so I'd love to be able to hand down punishment as soon as I am sure they deserve it.

This concerns me, because what if you ban someone for micspam, didn't record the spam, and the guy appeals? You'll have zero proof that it actually happened.

You're getting a lot of support, however I have my reservations about you.

 

[Sargent¥]

This concerns me, because what if you ban someone for micspam, didn't record the spam, and the guy appeals? You'll have zero proof that it actually happened.

You're getting a lot of support, however I have my reservations about you.

Admins don't require proof for things like that.

 

[DaivdBaekr]

https://www.skial.com/threads/idkitty-inappropriate-spray.74000/
https://www.skial.com/threads/papa-stache-d-inappropriate-spray.74092/

Since this is your fourth application and you still do not know the rules, the application is declined.

 

[T-Wayne]

"Porn sprays aren't against the rules" is nowhere stated, but it clearly reads in the rules that "We reserve the right to remove any spray even if they are not listed above."
Technically he did nothing wrong, reporting it considering everyone can remove them on their own discretion, I would remove porn sprays, but I'd not ban the user.

 

[Sargent¥]

"Porn sprays aren't against the rules" is nowhere stated, but it clearly reads in the rules that "We reserve the right to remove any spray even if they are not listed above."
Technically he did nothing wrong, reporting it considering everyone can remove them on their own discretion, I would remove porn sprays, but I'd not ban the user.

I don't think we'd go to the extremities of stating everything that's not in the rules, the applicant should assume that if it's not written in the rules, it's not a rule, plain and simple.