BryceM

Banned
I don't think we should be banning people for this, because it's more a fault of the map itself. I think the map should be fixed up to no longer allow this exploit. It doesn't really hurt any other players, and it's not the easiest exploit to do, as it's very easy to fall off while doing. I do believe UFO may have been warned or even banned for this in the past, but I still don't think this is banworthy.

https://www.skial.com/threads/spooky-diosrep-hardcoreufo-rng-exploit.125145/
 
I don't think we should be banning people for this, because it's more a fault of the map itself. I think the map should be fixed up to no longer allow this exploit. It doesn't really hurt any other players, and it's not the easiest exploit to do, as it's very easy to fall off while doing. I do believe UFO may have been warned or even banned for this in the past, but I still don't think this is banworthy.

https://www.skial.com/threads/spooky-diosrep-hardcoreufo-rng-exploit.125145/
I would say add player clips around the ledges and corner
 
Yes,easter eggs should not get you banned and maps design should get fixed totally before being able to play the map.

But it's not even that serious so it's okay to leave the exploits alone :troll:.
 
Yes,easter eggs should not get you banned and maps design should get fixed totally before being able to play the map.

But it's not even that serious so it's okay to leave the exploits alone :troll:.
It's an exploit that doesn't hurt anyone. I'm not a mapper, but I can't imagine it takes very long to fix that up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DraviXi99
En el supermercado puedes evitar parte del jefe parándote en una esquina, no noto la diferencia +1
 
  • Like
Reactions: DraviXi99
map exploits = bad map maker? for example, cream tea?
 
it's an exploit that gives the players an advantage of winning a mini game that should be played fair
Exploits happen when something isn't used the way it is meant to be. The argument presented is that not all exploits should be considered equal. They have to be measured and quantified in order to deliver an appropriate judgement.

In Newgrounds' case I think this is how we can break it down:

1. How advantageous is the exploit?
Very. Performing it guarantees a free win.

2. Does it prevent the game from proceeding?
Not at all. This isn't like the Luigi's Mansion exploit where the boss won't ever spawn and delay the round indefinitely.

3. Does it screw over other players?
Not at all. Other Red team members are not affected and can choose not to perform it themselves. You can make the case for the Activator, but then:
  • You've allowed them the prerogative to pick a mini-game by not winning the Deathrun.
  • The activator has no control over the mini-game itself. If it was a PvP mini-game, then I would agree with punishing the exploit.

4. Is the mapper’s design the primary cause?
Yes, it was very clearly an oversight.

The scale isn't nearly as large or potentially damaging as other exploits and hence should not be punished.
 
Last edited:
Exploits happen when something isn't used the way it is meant to be. The argument presented is that not all exploits should be considered equal. They have to be measured and quantified in order to deliver an appropriate judgement.

In Newgrounds' case I think this is how we can break it down:

1. How advantageous is the exploit?
Very. Performing it guarantees a free win.

2. Does it prevent the game from proceeding?
Not at all. This isn't like the Luigi's Mansion exploit where the boss won't ever spawn and delaying the round indefinitely.

3. Does it screw over other players?
Not at all. Other Red team members are not affected and can choose not to perform it themselves. You can make the case for the Activator, but then:
  • You've allowed them the prerogative to pick a mini-game by not winning the Deathrun.
  • The activator has no control over the mini-game itself. If it was a PvP mini-game, then I would agree with punishing the exploit.

4. Is the mapper’s design law the primary cause?
Yes, it was very clearly an oversight.

The scale isn't nearly as large or potentially damaging as other exploits and hence should not be punished.
Regardless of how little an exploit may be, for example, standing on a ledge, staying in a spot where a motivator is unable to kill you, an exploit is still an exploit, and thus should be punished.
 
Keep reporting exploiters bud. You're doing a fantastic job of keeping Skial free of Cream Tea Jr's
Honestly the difference is very simple

These people are doing a peaceful protest against some skial dr rules that could be considered bs

CT on the other hand, would basically be the edgy troll he is on Skial and known for doing the most fucked things and when a person who said a slur to target a minority group. Instead of calling that bad actors behavior out, he would be on their side and then Blame Kala or gala because the person who said fucked things got their muted extended to 1 month instead of 1 week because the bad actor was commenting on steam profiles going "PLSS PLSS PLS PLS READ MY APPEAL AND UNBAN MEEEEEEEE :("
 
  • Like
Reactions: lucas4647