Declined Turbine seems unpopular - remove the 64-player servers?

Dommy

Dommy

Mildly Menacing Medic
In comparison to 2fort it seems as though turbine is actually rather unpopular, and I find it hard to reason why turbine should have 64-player servers when it's turning out difficult to even fill 32 slots outside the few peak hours.

I've noticed a trend now where 2fort has 60+ players (both EU and US) and at the exact same time, 64-player turbine servers are either empty or they have less than 25 players on them. Seems quite wasteful, to be fair.

Is there a reason to believe that 64-player turbine is the most popular option after 2fort? That there isn't some other map in the game that would be more popular with 64 players?

Now admittedly, I've seen 64-player turbine servers being full. However, they don't seem to be full anywhere near as often as the 2fort servers are.

Right now the US turbine server is 1/64.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
This suggestion has been closed. Votes are no longer accepted.
Bottiger said:
I don't know why you say that when both US and EU hits 64 players daily.

Just because they aren't filled when you are playing doesn't mean anything.

https://stats.skial.com/#server/123

https://stats.skial.com/#server/28
Click to expand...
Well, barely. If you check your own graphs which you cited here, on 04/25 it hit 39 players on EU (the max). So it's not true that it hits 64 players daily and I'm not sure why you'd claim that when the graph doesn't support such claim?
That was also on Friday evening...

Anyway, my point is that there may be a map which is more popular for second option (next to 2fort).

And the activity graph difference between 2fort and turbine is like night and day in any case.
 
Last edited:
Do I really have to bust out screenshots?

Turbine+ EU has hit 64 players in 6 out of the last 7 days. Don't ask me why it randomly half full on certain days. It doesn't really matter, this is already really good.

WzZSLk7.jpeg


Turbine+ US is even better.

VEYyVXN.jpeg


If you have any evidence to suggest that any other map would be more popular with 64 players, bring some evidence instead of suggesting something else be shut down.
 
The suggestion was based on the observation that it still doesn't come close to 2fort in terms of popularity, so I wondered if there could possibly be something more popular to consider for 64 players. But it's also possible that nothing out there comes close to 2fort in that.

Anyway, if you're happy with the activity then that's fair.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back