Declined Admin App: The Ur Pigeon

Status
Not open for further replies.
Really nice guy, gets along with everyone. I think he would be great as a admin cause he is always on the server and is never mean to anyone. He makes sure no one is breaking rules. The time I have been on the server he has always been funny and a good attitude towards everything. I give a huge +1 to Pigeon!
 
+0 for but overall you have the playtime, 16 days is pretty impressive if you ask me and you have nothing in your ban history which is also very impressive
i just think, judging from your chat, and point that ,you need to not use the votemenu so much and be more respectful and friendlier to players, i think if you do this your admin material
but until then im settled at a 0

EDITED 7/14/2014:
As seeing that you have fixed your ban command and have adjusted along with receiving all the good feedback and information, i have changed to a +1 and hope the best for you m8.

Best Regards,
Turki_Vulture 5 :D
 
Last edited:
As a server regular, I would like to submit an additional +1 towards pigeon becoming a server admin. I've only personally been aware of the presence of a few server admins. I think Pigeon would make a great additional to the Skial team. He is extremely nice and helpful to new players, always discouraging people who break server rules, and encourage fun, fair play. I've played a lot with pigeon and I believe no one else on the server is better suited to the position of admin.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chives
Turki_Vulture 5 said:
+0 for but overall you have the playtime, 16 days is pretty impressive if you ask me and you have nothing in your ban history which is also very impressive
i just think, judging from your chat, and point that ,you need to not use the votemenu so much and be more respectful and friendlier to players, i think if you do this your admin material
but until then im settled at a 0
Click to expand...

Thanks for your feedback. Thanks for the compliments regarding playtime and lack of bans, I like to think I keep pretty well in line. I tried to explain that my use of the vote menu was in the right a few posts ago, but if that wasn't sufficient I understand. The chat stuff is all fair, it all looks pretty cringey when laid bare like that. Hopefully between the posts that have gone and those that will come, someone will change your mind.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spirit ~
TapTap said:
I suggest you add to your application your previous admin experience, if any.

Also, why voteban Axmann when you could have votemuted him for racism/micspam?
Even if the vote passed, you could've still reported him (if valid, he'd be silenced properly).

I'll pitch in my opinion when I see more feedback from the regs of your server. Good luck!
Click to expand...


Have you played with Axmann? Ugh. Just ugh.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Ur Pigeon
Konata-chan said:
-1. you have no admin friends.
Click to expand...

Being friends with admins is not a requirement.

[NFH] Sargent¥ said:
+0, will change if your ban command description is fixed, while it may not seem like much, it is crucial that the description is accurate in case banned user wants to appeal.

PS. your command isn't wrong but the reasoning for ban / description isn't write, as asked, you need to fulfill the procedures of banning an aimbotter.
Click to expand...

His command is 100% correct. Please do not comment on admin apps if you have no idea what you are talking about. Sorry- didn't see that the OP was edited. My apologies.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Sargent¥ and The Ur Pigeon
chuckwagon said:
His command is 100% correct. Please do not comment on admin apps if you have no idea what you are talking about.
Click to expand...
I believe what Sargent is talking about is the given ban reason, which was "No-Clip Hacking". Nothing much, OP quickly fixed it.
 
TapTap said:
I believe what Sargent is talking about is the given ban reason, which was "No-Clip Hacking". Nothing much, OP quickly fixed it.
Click to expand...

As I understand it, the test is more to gauge your ability to correctly enter the command. The reason is less important because it's a hypothetical scenario anyway. Now if I had put the reason in the wrong place I would understand.
 
TapTap said:
I believe what Sargent is talking about is the given ban reason, which was "No-Clip Hacking". Nothing much, OP quickly fixed it.
Click to expand...
Correct.
Example, what if he put "hacking" and it was mic spam, if the user appeals and says, "but I never hacked" then there's probably an issue.
 
Last edited:
+1 for pigeon. I'm a server regular and I think he would make a great admin. He's a lot of fun to play with and he's very fair. If it looks like he's too fond of the votemenu that's only because we really need it sometimes. Having played with him a lot and talked to him 1 on 1, I can say from experience that he is very friendly, respectful, and a good person. If you made him admin I am confident that you would not regret it.
 
Dr.Shoe said:
This isn't a good reason to -1 at all.


however, seeing what cr33p3r put, -1.

EDIT: Seeing as to how you've explained yourself, not quite sure what to put

revoking my minus one and not giving input at the moment
Click to expand...

Listen to your heart. There's nothing else you can do.
 
+1 for Pigeon. I almost exclusively play this server, because he, and a few of the other regulars make it a great place to play. He's always fair, friendly, level headed, and would make a great admin.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom
Back