Spider-Man Statue Removed From South Korean Playground Because It Has A Gigantic Boner
the best part is all of the dick jokes the author managed to work into the article
After erecting a statue of Spider-Man in a South Korean shopping center, artist Eunsuk Yoo met stiff resistance from the people who run it. It seems they took a long, hard look at the spectacular piece after suspicions were aroused about its suitability. The statue has now been yanked off, despite being impressively hung on that wall for almost a year. Yoo may feel he got the shaft, but one hopes he understands the thrust of the mall’s decision.

It’s mainly because the statue has a giant tumescent penis and people were starting to get weirded out.

The statue was commissioned for the Lotte Shopping Center in Busan, South Korea, specifically near the mall’s playground which… I mean, we can all agree that was probably a bad choice, right? The statue’s extremely prominent phallus has mostly gone unnoticed for the past year, likely because the statue is positioned high on the wall, though from the side Spider-Man’s excitement at the prospect of fighting crime is certainly visible. It seems action truly is his reward.

Recent weeks have brought a number of complaints from shoppers, and while Yoo was given the option to modify the statue (possibly with a cold shower), he has instead opted to just remove it from the building entirely rather than change his art.

Yoo, in a Facebook post, has vowed to “reach out to the public with a better work next time.” As for Spider-Man, he managed to stay up for almost a year, so he should probably see a doctor.
 
Here goes congress wasting time on posturing. Boehner probably doesnt have anything in terms of actual proof so congress is gonna waste time going through with this for absolutely nothing.
 
Since its a suicide barrier I assume its going tall enough for it to be physically impossible to climb over.

The bridge's board voted in 2008 to install a stainless steel net, rejecting other options, including raising the 4-foot-high railings and leaving the iconic span unchanged. Two years later, they certified the final environmental impact report for the net, which would stretch about 20 feet wide on each side of the span.

so basically they're adding a net instead of making a taller barrier if I read it correctly. so whats stopping them from going out on the net and jumping from there
 
so basically they're adding a net instead of making a taller barrier if I read it correctly. so whats stopping them from going out on the net and jumping from there
Of the people who have survived the jump, they all immediately regretted their decision. If these people jump, I bet most would regret it and when they hit the net, less likely to jump off again.