Lord Killington

Legendary Skial King
You're probably thinking "oh it's THIS thread again." But you'd be wrong. I'm proposing we ditch voteban, as ban-worthy offenses should probably be dealt with by admins, and replace it with a "3 strike rule" votekick.
It works like this.
A wild HACKER appears!
SKIAL USERS use VOTEKICK!
It's super effective!
HACKER was kicked!
*trainer uses revive" Go HACKER!
SKIAL USERS use VOTEKICK!
It's super effective!
HACKER was kicked!
*trainer uses revive" Go HACKER!
SKIAL USERS use VOTEKICK!
It's super effective!
HACKER was kicked!
HACKER was banned for 30 mins!
 
This suggestion has been closed. Votes are no longer accepted.
If that's the case, then we should probably lower the threshold for the percentage needed to pass.
 
If that's the case, then we should probably lower the threshold for the percentage needed to pass.
Yeah, that would be useful... the amount of votes needed is unreasonably high, like if 2 people like that hack, then bam, hacker stays :( Stuff like that
 
I don't see how this adds any value.

If someone needs to be removed from the game, they should be banned or else they will just rejoin.

This just makes the system more complicated and still allows for abuse.
 
I don't see how this adds any value.

If someone needs to be removed from the game, they should be banned or else they will just rejoin.

This just makes the system more complicated and still allows for abuse.
I agree, but I still don't know why we have the votekick system, because the player just comes back in a matter of seconds. There should be a way where they aren't aloud to come back immediate, and if they get kicked x amount of times they are banned. Kinda what Killington just said.
 
as always, Bottiger's explanation makes sense.

I supposed if an admin felt that a 3-kick system would work in a given situation, he/she could do it him/herself