Chris Hansen's had it rough.
Jen6 Mildly Menacing Medic Oct 30, 2011 #4 So, you're saying there were no sexual implications after you asked a 13 year old girl to give you a pair of her dirty underwear?
So, you're saying there were no sexual implications after you asked a 13 year old girl to give you a pair of her dirty underwear?
ViperStriker Banned Contributor Oct 30, 2011 #5 Jen6 said: So, you're saying there were no sexual implications after you asked a 13 year old girl to give you a pair of her dirty underwear? Click to expand...
Jen6 said: So, you're saying there were no sexual implications after you asked a 13 year old girl to give you a pair of her dirty underwear? Click to expand...
Gigz Face-Melting F2Per Contributor Oct 30, 2011 #6 Jen6 said: So, you're saying there were no sexual implications after you asked a 13 year old girl to give you a pair of her dirty underwear? Click to expand... It was a Boy. Reactions: Jen6
Jen6 said: So, you're saying there were no sexual implications after you asked a 13 year old girl to give you a pair of her dirty underwear? Click to expand... It was a Boy.
Jen6 Mildly Menacing Medic Oct 30, 2011 #7 Giggelz HallowHeart said: It was a Boy. Click to expand... Close enough.
