People see someone that's better than them, and since they already think they're hot shit, they assume that anyone that is doing better than them is hacking.
Ok, for all those saying the evidence is needed, I have one simple question: When this guy plays on Turbine us5.skial.com, shouldn't a ban vote of 23 yes and 4 no kick him out of the server?
Please let me know, because I would expect an 85% yes vote to pass.
Ok, for all those saying the evidence is needed, I have one simple question: When this guy plays on Turbine us5.skial.com, shouldn't a ban vote of 23 yes and 4 no kick him out of the server?
Please let me know, because I would expect an 85% yes vote to pass.
yea... votes must be broken. this vote has been called 10 times in the past hour. everyone says aimbot. More demo's appear to be required.
It's pretty silly that the consensus is that "they're just a pro" or "he's not good enough to be hacking". A good hacker will humanize the aimbot. Google it... these aimbots are untraceable by VAC (VAC is a joke btw) and can be turned on and off or tweaked for just body shots. We'll just have to wait for more demos I guess.
It's gonna look pretty silly tho once this is proved.
(BTW)... the very fact that this has come up 3 times should be telling...
No, they aren't going to be obvious when 5 people are speccing them. No they aren't a MLG pro sniper. As I've said before, there are WAY better snipers than this that nobody is complaining about. Funny that the people who are voting are (for the most part) not ever in turbine, don't know this clown, and think that speccing for 3 minutes is all the proof they need.
more demos... right right... I dunno ... it seems hit-you-over-the-head obvious at this point.
I wish I got a bunch of angry accusing posts like these directed at me as well. I'm obviously not good enough.yea... votes must be broken. this vote has been called 10 times in the past hour. everyone says aimbot. More demo's appear to be required.
It's pretty silly that the consensus is that "they're just a pro" or "he's not good enough to be hacking". A good hacker will humanize the aimbot. Google it... these aimbots are untraceable by VAC (VAC is a joke btw) and can be turned on and off or tweaked for just body shots. We'll just have to wait for more demos I guess.
It's gonna look pretty silly tho once this is proved.
(BTW)... the very fact that this has come up 3 times should be telling...
No, they aren't going to be obvious when 5 people are speccing them. No they aren't a MLG pro sniper. As I've said before, there are WAY better snipers than this that nobody is complaining about. Funny that the people who are voting are (for the most part) not ever in turbine, don't know this clown, and think that speccing for 3 minutes is all the proof they need.
more demos... right right... I dunno ... it seems hit-you-over-the-head obvious at this point.
if he's an aimbot it's a disappointing one.
Aimbots don't make you invincible. If you google around you see they can be tweaked A LOT. You can turn then on and off with a key, set it for the fire key, or even set it to auto-fire when the crosshair is over a guys head. Any hacker worth his salt wouldn't be aimbotting at 100% capacity 100% of the time.
That's nice and all, but it really doesn't matter how much theoretical information you come with, this guy won't get banned unless you can provide some real evidence that makes us 100% sure he's hacking. You don't put someone on the electric chair unless you know for sure that the guy is guilty.Aimbots don't make you invincible. If you google around you see they can be tweaked A LOT. You can turn then on and off with a key, set it for the fire key, or even set it to auto-fire when the crosshair is over a guys head. Any hacker worth his salt wouldn't be aimbotting at 100% capacity 100% of the time.
I hereby accuse you of hacking. Why? Because you've gotten lucky shots with the loch-n-load and I think that means you must be hacking for those shots only because a hacker wouldn't use his aimbot 100% of the time.Aimbots don't make you invincible. If you google around you see they can be tweaked A LOT. You can turn then on and off with a key, set it for the fire key, or even set it to auto-fire when the crosshair is over a guys head. Any hacker worth his salt wouldn't be aimbotting at 100% capacity 100% of the time.
Ok, for all those saying the evidence is needed, I have one simple question: When this guy plays on Turbine us5.skial.com, shouldn't a ban vote of 23 yes and 4 no kick him out of the server?
Please let me know, because I would expect an 85% yes vote to pass.
It's there to prevent griefing. Although I usually agree with that the number of required votes needs to be lowered, situations like these makes me think that perhaps it shouldn't be.Regardless, when a vote is 85%, it should pass, shouldn't it?
I'll make sure he's my no.1 target. Backstabs after backstabs. I'll make him a paranoid sniper. Oh, and I need practice with my ambassador too!
Does he use a strange Razorback?He uses razorback. Good luck with the ambassador though.
I believe the vote is closer to 91%, I'm not absolutly positive on that.Cheating or not.
Proof needed or not.
Regardless, when a vote is 85%, it should pass, shouldn't it? It's not permanent. But then again, I do understand how people might not agree with this statement.
Anyways, next time he's in the server, aimbotting or not, I'll make sure he's my no.1 target. Backstabs after backstabs. I'll make him a paranoid sniper. Oh, and I need practice with my ambassador too!