Skial

No it means you need good evidence

What about the chat context that I linked in that report? He iniated the vote and then responded back with a Lenny face. Does that not come across as abusive or trollish?

34 seconds after the vote and 3 seconds after killing you, most would think it was because of the latter.

I thought that iniating a vote on someone who has not broken the rules would constitute as abuse of the votemenu?

There is evidence he called a vote, but there is no good evidence that it was abusive.

So they get away for almost having me vote slayed without a reason to call the vote in the first place? Sorry for pestering you about this issue.

Unless you have better evidence, and I assume you don't.

If you record a demo every time you connect to Skial you have excellent evidence of rule-breaking nearly 100% of the time.

This script makes it pretty easy:
bind "[" "record report; status; voice_loopback 1"; bind "]" "stop demo"

But you don't find it odd that they took the time out of their round as Hale to access the votemenu, and attempt to slay me even though he was perfectly capable of killing me shortly afterwards?

Not really, no.

Alright then. If this happens again, will something be done?