Recent content by Jakob

Name on poster: Munk Class: Soldier Map*: idk Team*: red Hat(s) & Cosmetic(s) (w/ paints)*: Pink All-father - Pink Max's head - infernal impaler /w cloud 9 Weapons*: Stock Rocket Launcher Custom pose: idk

What are you giving away?

The fact that it says ''Internet Explorer'' ruins it for me.

+1

Oh I see :)

That was quite random...

My apologize for misunderstanding so much, I didn't mean to cause commotion.

How am I supposed to know this? I can't read your thoughts... I'm just asking you to clarify this when doing something like this again. I'm not mad either, I just got confused.

You don't understand what I'm talking about... He didn't state if there were any demos or not, so I thought he wanted my opinion. When he asked for commands, I didn't know what commands he was talking about, since I didn't know if there were evidence or not.

Also next time, could you be more clear on what you want me to do? I got really confused about what you wanted me to do, you could have just asked me for the command.

sm_ban ''#[U:1:5678]'' 0 ''Hacking'' I just don't see the point of it, it's not that I'm against doing it again. :)

Since I already wrote a ban command in the application, I can't see where you wanna get with this.

Again for what? You didn't state that the accuser had any evidence? Therefore I will do nothing until I have proof? So I don't need to do any commands?

What do you mean it lacks commands? Like do you want the console commands or what are you talking about?

It all depends on the evidence... Let's say there is no evidence and it's one of the usual ''This guy is hacking'' type of report, with no evidence, beside of the ''hackers'' score, I will probably drop the charge. If there is evidence against him hacking, for example multiple people saying it...