This topic is going off from what it should be. To you this is some nancy shit. Fine. To us we actually look at it from the reporter's eyes. Valid as in Cyberbullying won't be tolerated. That is fact now. This kid just could be a neglected individual in life, and he's directing his anger and frustration to another person on the internet.
To you this maybe nothing at all except some hurt feelings. Thats how you look at it.
To us we look at it that way also, but with a chance that this person who is shooting these "tasteless" words you call it, something a little bit more concerning. If its tasteless then nobody would report it no?
I get these type of shit heads that you are saying are doing nothing all the time. They throw racial slurs at me all the time, but the way they do it is "Tasteless" in many cases where I'm not bothered by it. Theres a fine line between "Tasteless" and threatening. You may not see what is threatening but the person who is offended might be. Don't think everyone is as big and badass as you are.
Oversensitive or not, People don't go on to the internet and expect to handle everything like a badass. To be honest, Some of these people that are "Nancy" as you call it, probably live with respect and peace IRL. So these people on the internet live behind a screen where they can mask their emotions and take advantage of anyone.
CyberBullying should not be tolerable. Thats my Point.
what is this topic exactly straying off of? if you truly believe this is cyber-bullying (note that it stresses repeatable offenses, this is just act #1) then you should take it up with the police, and they'll probably tell you whether this person is just a drama queen or not.
and yes, to me this is just a person who just got their feelings hurt and exaggerated about it, if you agree with the person filing this report that she has significant emotional-traumatic stigma because somebody made a dead-mom joke, alongside being haunted by this "dangerous stalker" as she puts it, then you should make a suggestion to implement a "no insulting"-rule on the servers, other wise you'll have no case to justify anything regarding the shit-talking.
she could've gotten a good case if she made the report regarding the 7-or so votemenu votes he called on her, as that's actually against the rules, instead it's a big show and dance about some guy acting like a dick.
in what regard would you call the person out for "threatening" though? grow some skin. you don't go on the internet to expect everything will be around pink unicorns, rainbows and kittens sliding off said unicorn into an ocean of chocolate milk. you have to take account some people will be out there to not pertain to that illusion you have created for urself. shrug it off, if someone calls you a chink or a gook; deal with it for the moment and get them a ban.
Whereas your point has some logic in it, I have to point out that multiple attempts/discussions/debates are currently being held to review the principle of "anonymity" on the Internet. I personally encourage solid tracking and reporting mechanisms that would allow tracing the offender/cyber-criminal down.
I had been working at Comcast for almost two years as a Security Analyst and I can assure you that even if you are using proxies, VPNs and other precaution mechanisms to hide your identity - you still can be traced back. That's why I'm saying that once cyber law is implemented and enforced none proxy in the world will protect you from from being traced. If you cyber bully somebody up to the point when individual commits a suicide (God forbid) - simple warrant from the police will be enough for ISP to release all information about you and provide a detailed log of your Internet activity. It's almost impossible to hide yourself anymore. You might object saying that you'll start using Chinese and Russian proxies - that will not be the case since IANA already maintains the list of all known proxies and simple web filtering and ACLs will be able to restrict your access to these proxies easily.
You have to remember at all times that people are different and not everyone is immune to bullying (either RL or cyber), and people may act different. Also, in my humble opinion, cyber bullies look pathetic since it looks like they would never try to bully somebody up in RL just because they are scared and they know they might get punched right in their ugly faces... It just proves that cyber bullies are usually nothing in RL and by bullying people up on the Web are trying to maintain/feed their low self esteem. People like that also usually get no respect neither in RL nor on the Web.
it isn't like people are like "wow i'm going to spend my free time cyber-bullying someone, let me mask my identity, browse in TOR and sit behind a dozen proxies", cyber-bullying is a bit cryptic because i wouldn't be surprised if the person that got reported here just didn't think much of what he said (which i could agree with, how many times do get affected whenever calls you a douchebag over TF2?), cyber-bullying stresses "deliberate, repeated, and hostile manner.", i would say the manner would be hostile, but seeing it's his first time dealing with someone (and to be honest, how many times do you see people give someone shit because they're bad at the game? i know i'm guilty of frequently calling people out for being useless and not being credit to team) i would argue it wasn't a repeated occasion, nor would i say the person was deliberately trying to 'cause' something, other then temporal butthurt which people will get over.
in all, the guy was acting like a dick; big show and dance about it; would've been better to screenshot the votemenu abuse and give him a temp. ban for that. if you maintain that this person has suffered under all of this to justify it as cyber-bullying, bring it to someone who cares, or like i said: make a rule about it on the server.